Sckipio’s G.fast silicon to enable gigabit services
Sckipio’s newest G.fast broadband chipset family delivers 1.2 gigabits of aggregate bandwidth over 100m of telephone wire.
The start-up’s SCK-23000 chipset family implements the ITU’s G.fast Amendment 3 212a profile. The profile doubles the spectrum used from G.fast from 106MHz to 212MHz, boosting the broadband rates. In contrast, VDSL2 digital subscriber line technology uses 17MHz of spectrum only.
“What the telcos want is gigabit services,” says Michael Weissman, vice president of marketing at Sckipio. “This second-generation [chipset family] allows that.”
G.fast market
AT&T announced in August that it is rolling out G.fast technology in 22 metro regions in the US. The operator already offers G.fast to multi-dwelling units in eight of these metro regions. The rollout adds to the broadband services AT&T offers in 21 states.
AT&T’s purchase of DirecTV in 2015 has given the operator some 20 million coax lines, says Weissman. AT&T can now deliver broadband services to apartments that have the DirecTV satellite service by bringing a connection to the building’s roof. AT&T will deliver such connections using its own fibre or by partnering with an incumbent operator. Once connected, high-speed internet using G.fast can then be delivered over the coax cable, a superior medium compared to telephony wiring.
Michael Weissman“This is fundamentally going to change the game,” says Weissman. “AT&T can now compete with cable companies and incumbent operators in markets it couldn’t address before.”
Sckipio has secured four out of the top five telcos in the US that have chosen to do G.fast: AT&T, CenturyLink, Windstream and Frontier. “The two largest - AT&T and CenturyLink - are exclusively ours,” says Weissman.
In markets such as China, the focus is on fibre. The three largest Chinese operators had deployed some 260 million fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) lines by the end of July.
Overall, Sckipio is involved in some 100 G.fast pilots worldwide. The start-up is also the sole supplier of G.fast silicon to broadband vendor Calix and one of two suppliers to Adtran.
“Right now there are only two real deployments that are publicly announced - and I mean deployment volumes - AT&T and BT,” says Weissman. “The point is G.fast is real.”
Telcos have several requirements when it comes to G.fast deployment. One is that the technology delivers competitive broadband rates and that means gigabit services. Another is coverage: the ability to serve as high a percentage of customers as possible in a given region.
What the telcos want is gigabit services. This second-generation [chipset family] allows that.
Because G.fast works across the broader spectrum - 212MHz - advanced signal processing techniques are required to make the technology work. Known as vectoring, the signal processing technique rejects crosstalk - leaking signals - between the telephone wires at the distribution point. A further operator need is ‘vectoring density’, the ability to vector as many lines as possible.
It is these and other requirements that Sckipio has set out to address with its SCK-23000 chipset family.
SCK-23000 chipset
The SCK-23000 comprises two chipsets. One is the 8-port DP23000 chipset used at the distribution point unit (DPU) while the second chipset is the CP23000, used for customer premise equipment.
Sckipio is not saying what CMOS process is used to implement the chipsets. Nor will it say how many chips make up each of the chipsets.
As for performance, the chipsets enable an aggregate line-rate performance (downstream and upstream) of 1.7 gigabits-per-second (Gbps) over 50m, to 0.4Gbps over 300m. The DP23000 chipset also supports two bonded telephone lines, effectively doubling the line rate. In markets such as the US and Taiwan, a second wire pair to a home is common.
Vectoring density
Vectoring density dictates how many G.fast ports can be deployed as a distribution point. And the computationally-intensive task is even more demanding with the adoption of the 212a profile. “The larger the vector group, the more each subscriber’s line must know what every other subscriber’s signal is to manage the crosstalk - and you are doing it at twice the bandwidth,” says Weissman.
Sckipio says the SCK-23000 supports up to 96 ports (or 48 bonded ports) at the 212a profile. The design uses distributed parallel processing that spreads the vectoring computation among the DP23000 8-port devices used. “We are not specifying data paths between the chips but you are talking about gigabytes of traffic flowing in all directions, all of the time,” says Weissman.
The computation can not only be spread across the devices in a single distribution point box but across devices in different boxes. Operators can thus use a pay-as-you-grow model, adding a new box as required. “A 96-port design could be two 48-port boxes, or an 8-port box could [be combined to] become a 16- or 24-port design if you have a smaller multi-dwelling unit environment,” says Weissman.
Sckipio’s design also features a reverse power feed: power is fed to the distribution point to avoid having to install a costly power supply. Since the power must come from a subscriber, the box’s power demand must not be excessive. A 16-port box is a good compromise in that it is not too large and as subscriber-count grows, each new 16-port unit added can be powered by another consumer.
“You can only do that if you can do cross distribution-point-unit vectoring,” says Weissman. “It allows the telcos to do a reverse power feed at the densities they require.”
Dynamic bandwidth allocation
The chipsets also support co-ordinated dynamic bandwidth allocation, what Sckipio refers to as co-ordinated dynamic time assignment.
Unlike DSL where the spectrum is split between upstream and downstream traffic, G.fast partitions the two streams in time: the CPE chipset is either uploading or downloading traffic only.
Until now, an operator will preset a fixed upload-download ratio at installation. Now, with the latest silicon, dynamic bandwidth allocation can take place. The system assesses the changing usage of subscribers and adjusts the upload-download ratio accordingly. However, this must be co-ordinated across all users such that they all send and all receive data simultaneously.
“You can’t, under any circumstances, have lines uploading and downloading at the same time,” says Weissman. “All the systems that are vectored must be communicating in the same direction at the same time.” If they are not co-ordinated, crosstalk occurs. This is another crosstalk, in addition to the crosstalk caused by the adjacency of the telephone wires that is compensated for using vectoring.
“If you don’t co-ordinate across all the pairs, you create a different type of crosstalk which you can’t mitigate,” says Weissman. “This will kill the system.”
Sckipio says the SCK-23000 chipsets are already with customers and that the devices are generally available.
Sckipio improves G.fast’s speed, reach and density
Sckipio has enhanced the performance of its G.fast chipset, demonstrating 1 gigabit data rates over 300 meter of telephone wire. The G.fast broadband standard has been specified for 100 meters only. The Israeli start-up has also demonstrated 2 gigabit performance by bonding two telephone wires.
Michael Weissman
“Understand that G.fast is still immature,” says Michael Weissman, co-founder and vice president of marketing at Sckipio. “We have improved the performance of G.fast by 40 percent this summer because we haven’t had time to do the optimisation until now.”
The company also announced a 32-port distribution point unit (DPU), the aggregation unit that is fed via fibre and delivers G.fast to residences.
G.fast is part of the toolbox enabling faster and faster speeds, and fills an important role in the wireline broadband market
The 32-port design is double Sckipio’s current largest DPU design. The DPU uses eight Sckipio 4-port DP3000 distribution port chipsets, and moving to 32 lines requires more demanding processing to tackle the greater crosstalk. Vectoring uses signal processing to implement noise cancellation techniques to counter the crosstalk and is already used for VDSL2.
G.fast
“G.fast is part of the toolbox enabling faster and faster speeds, and fills an important role in the wireline broadband market,” says Julie Kunstler, principal analyst, components at market research firm, Ovum.
G.fast achieves gigabit rates over copper by expanding the usable spectrum to 106 MHz. VDSL2, the current most advanced digital subscriber line (DSL) standard, uses 17 MHz of spectrum. But operating at higher frequencies induces signal attenuation, shortening the reach. VDSL2 is deployed over 1,500 meter links typically whereas G.fast distances will likely be 300 meters or less.
Another issue is signal leakage or crosstalk between copper pairs in a cable bundle that can house tens or hundreds of copper twisted pairs. Moreover, the crosstalk becomes greater with frequency. The leakage causes each twisted pair not only to carry the signal sent but also noise, the sum of the leakage components from neighbouring pairs. Vectoring is used to restore a line's data capacity.
G.fast can be seen as the follow-on to VDSL2 but there are notable differences. Besides the wider 106 MHz spectrum, G.fast uses a different duplexing scheme. DSL uses frequency-division duplexing (FDD) where the data transmission is continuous - upstream (from the home) and downstream - but on different frequency bands or tones. In contrast, G.fast uses time-division duplexing (TDD) where all the spectrum is used to either send data or receive data.
Using TDD, the ability to adapt the upstream and downstream data ratio as well as put G.fast in a low-power mode when idle are features that DSL does not share.
“There are many attributes [of DSL] that are brought into this standard but, at a technical level, G.fast is quite fundamentally different,” says Weissman.
One Tier-1 operator has already done the bake-off and will very soon select its vendors
Status
Sckipio says all the largest operators are testing G.fast in their labs or are conducting field trials but few are going public.
Ovum stresses that telcos are pursuing a variety of broadband strategies with G.fast being just one.
Some operators have decided to deploy fibre, while others are deploying a variety of upgrade technologies - fibre-based and copper-based. G.fast can be a good fit for certain residential neighbourhood topologies, says Kunstler.
The economics of passive optical networking (PON) continues to improve. “The costs of building an optical distribution network has declined significantly, and the costs of PON equipment are reasonable,” says Kunstler, adding that skilled fibre technicians now exist in many countries and working with fibre is easier than ever before.
“Many operators see fibre as important for business services so why not just pull the fibre to support volume-residential and high average-revenue-per-user (ARPU) based business services,” she says. But in some regions, G.fast broadband speeds will be sufficient from a competitive perspective.
“One Tier-1 operator has already done the bake-off and will very soon select its vendors,” says Weissman. “Then the hard work of integrating this into their IT systems starts.”
And BT has announced that it had delivered up to 330 megabit-per-second in a trial of G.fast involving 2,000 homes, and has since announced other trials.
“BT has publically announced it can achieve 500 megabits - up and down - over 300 meters running from their cabinets,” says Weissman. “If BT moves its fibre closer to the distribution point, it will likely achieve 800 or 900 megabit rates.” Accordingly, the average customer could benefit from 500 megabit broadband from as early as 2016. And such broadband performance would be adequate for users for 8 to 10 years, he says
Meanwhile, Sckipio and other G.fast chip vendors, as well as equipment makers are working to ensure that their systems interoperate.
Sckipio has also shown G.fast running over coax cable within multi-dwelling units delivering speeds beyond 1 gigabit. “This allows telcos to compete with cable operators and go in places they have not historically gone,” says Weissman.
Standards work
The ITU-T is working to enhance the G.fast standard further using several techniques.
One is to increase the transmission power which promises to substantially improve performance. Another is to use more advanced modulation to carry extra bits per tone across the wire’s spectrum. The third approach is to double the wire's used spectrum from 106 MHz to 212 MHz.
All three approaches complicate transmission, however. Increasing the signal power and spectrum will increase crosstalk and require more vectoring, while more complex modulation will require advanced signal recovery, as will using more spectrum.
“The guys working in committee need to find the apex of these compromises,” says Weissman, adding that Sckipio believes it can generate a 50 to 70 percent improvement in data rate over a single pair using these enhancements. The standard work is likely be completed next spring.
Sckipio says it has over 30 customers for its chips that are designing over 50 G.fast systems, for the home and/ or the distribution point.
So far Sckipio has announced it is working with Calix, Adtran, Chinese original design manufacturer Cambridge Industries Group (CIG) and Zyxel, and says Sckipio products are on show in over 12 booths at the Broadband World Forum show.
Business services and mobile revive WDM-PON interest
"WDM-PON is many things to many people" - Jon Baldry
It was in 2005 that Novera Optics, a pioneer of WDM-PON (wavelength-division multiplexing, passive optical networking), was working with Korea Telecom in a trial involving 50,000 residential lines. Yet, one decade later, WDM-PON remains an emerging technology. And when a WDM-PON deployment does occur, it is for business services and mobile backhaul rather than residential broadband.
WDM-PON delivers high-capacity, symmetrical links using a dedicated wavelength. The links are also secure, an important consideration for businesses, and in contrast to PON where data is shared between all the end points, each selecting its addressed data.
One issue hindering the uptake of WDM-PON is the lack of a common specification. "WDM-PON is many things to many people," says Jon Baldry, technical marketing director at Transmode.
One view of WDM-PON is as the ultimate broadband technology; this was Novera's vision. Other vendors, such as Transmode, emphasise the WDM component of the technology, seeing it as a way to push metro-style networking towards the network edge, to increase bandwidth and for operational simplicity.
WDM-PON's uptake for residential access has not yet happened because the high bandwidth it offers is still not needed, while the system economics do not match those of PON.
Gigabit PON (GPON) and Ethernet PON (EPON) are now deployed in the tens of millions worldwide. And operators can turn to 10G-EPON and XG-PON when the bandwidth of GPON and EPON are insufficient. Beyond that, TWDM-PON (Time and Wavelength Division Multiplexing PON) is an emerging approach, promoted by the likes of Alcatel-Lucent and Huawei. TWDM-PON uses wavelength-division multiplexing as a way to scale PON, effectively supporting multiple 10 Gigabit PONs, each riding on a wavelength.
Carriers like the reassurance a technology roadmap such as PON's provides, but their broadband priority is wireless rather than wireline. The bigger portion of their spending is on rolling out LTE since wireless is their revenue earner.
As for fixed broadband, operators are being creative.
G.fast is one fixed broadband example. G.fast is the latest DSL standard that supports gigabit speeds over telephone wire. Using G.fast, operators can combine fibre and DSL to achieve gigabit rates and avoid the expense of taking fibre all the way to the home. BT is one operator backing G.fast, with pilot schemes scheduled for the summer. And if the trials are successful, G.fast deployments could start next year.
Deutsche Telekom is promoting a hybrid router to customers that combines fixed and wireless broadband, with LTE broadband kicking in when the DSL line becomes loaded.
Meanwhile, vendors with a WDM background see WDM-PON as a promising way to deliver high-volume business services, while also benefiting from the operator's cellular push by supporting mobile backhaul and mobile fronthaul. They don't dismiss WDM-PON for residential broadband but accept that the technology must first mature.
Transmode announced recently its first public customer, US operator RST Global Communications, which is using the vendor's iWDM-PON platform for business services.
"Our primary focus is business and mobile backhaul, and we are pushing WDM deeper into access networks," says Baldry. "We don't want a closed network where we treat WDM-PON differently to the way we treat the rest of the network." This means using the C-band wavelength grid for metro and WDM-PON. This avoids having to use optical-electrical-optical translation, as required between PON and WDM networks, says Baldry.
The iWDM-PON system showing the seeder light source at the central office (CO) optical line terminal (OLT), and the multiplexer (MDU) that selects the individual light band for the end point customer premise equipment (CPE). Source: Transmode.
Transmode's iWDM-PON
Several schemes are being pursued to implement WDM-PON. One approach is seeded or self-tuning, where a broadband light source is transmitted down the fibre from the central office. An optical multiplexer is then used to pick off narrow bands of the light, each a seeder source to set the individual wavelength of each end point optical transceiver. An alternative approach is to use a tunable laser transceiver to set the upstream wavelength. A third scheme combines the broadband light source concept with coherent technology that picks off each transceiver's wavelength. The coherent approach promises extremely dense, 1,000 wavelength WDM-PONs.
Transmode has chosen the seeded scheme for the iWDM-PON platform. The system delivers 40, 1 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) wavelengths spaced 50 GHz apart. The reach between the WDM-PON optical line terminal (OLT) and the optical network unit (ONU) end-points is 20 km without dispersion compensation fibre, or 30 km using such fibre. The platform uses WDM-PON SFP pluggable modules. The SFPs are MSA-compliant and use a fabry-perot laser and an avalanche photo-detector optimised for the injection-locked signal.
"We use the C-band and pluggable optics, so the choice of using WDM-PON optics or not is up to the customer," says Baldry. "It should not be a complicated decision, and the system should work seamlessly with everything else you do, enabling a mix of WDM-PON and regular higher speed or longer reach WDM over the same access network, as needed."
Baldry claims the approach has economic advantages as well as operational benefits. While there is a need for a broadband light source, the end point SFP WDM-PON transceivers are cheaper compared to fixed or tunable optics. Also setting the wavelengths is automated; the engineers do not need to set and lock the wavelength as they do using a tunable laser.
"The real advantage is operational simplicity," says Baldry, especially when an operator needs to scale optically connected end-points as they grow business and mobile backhaul services. "That is the intention of a PON-like network; if you are ramping up the end points then you have to think of the skill levels of the installation crews as you move to higher service volumes," he says.
RST Global Communications uses Transmode's Carrier Ethernet 2.0 as the service layer between the demarcation device (network interface device or NID) at the customer's premises, while using Transmode's packet-optical cards in the central office. WDM-PON provides the optical layer linking the two.
An early customer application for RST was upgrading a hotel's business connection from a few megabits to 1Gbps to carry Wi-Fi traffic in advance of a major conference it was hosting.
Overall, Transmode has a small number of operators deploying the iWDM-PON, with more testing or trialing it, says Baldry. The operators are interested in using the WDM-PON platform for mobile backhaul, mobile fronthaul and business services.
There are also operators that use installed access/ customer premise equipment from other vendors, exploring whether Transmode's WDM-PON platform can simplify the optical layer in their access networks.
Further developments
Transmode's iWDM-PON upgrade plans include moving the system from a two fibre design - one for the downstream traffic and one for the upstream traffic - to a single fibre one. To do this, the vendor will segment the C-band into two: half the C-band for the uplink and half for the downlink.
Another system requirement is to increase the data rate carried by each wavelength beyond a gigabit. Mobile fronthaul uses the Common Public Radio Interface (CPRI) standard to connect the remote radio head unit that typically resides on the antenna and the baseband unit.
CPRI data rates are multiples of the basic rate of 614.4 Mbps. As such 3 Gbps, 6 Gbps and rates over 10 Gbps are used. Baldry says the current iWDM-PON system can be extended beyond 1 Gbps to 2.5 Gbps and potentially 3 Gbps but because the system in noise-limited, the seeder light scheme will not stretch to 10 Gbps. A different optical scheme will be needed for 10 Gigabit. The iWDM-PON's passive infrastructure will allow for an in-service upgrade to 10 Gigabit WDM-PON technology once it becomes technically and economically viable.
Transmode has already conducted mobile fronthaul field trials in Russia and in Asia, and lab trials in Europe, using standard active and passive WDM and covering the necessary CPRI rates. "We are not mixing it with WDM-PON just yet; that is the next step," says Baldry.
Further information
WDM-PON Forum, click here
Lightwave Magazine: WDM-PON is a key component in next generation access
10 Gigabit Plain Old Telephone Service
Bell Labs has sent unprecedented amounts of data down a telephone wire. The research arm of Alcatel-Lucent has achieved one-gigabit streams in both directions over 70m of wire, and 10-gigabit one-way over 30m using a bonded pair of telephone wires.
Keith RussellThe demonstrations show how gigabit-speed broadband could use telephone wire to bridge the gap between a local optical fibre point and a home. The optical fibre point may be located at the curbside, on a wall or in an apartment's basement.
Service providers want to deliver gigabit services to compete with cable operators and developments like Google Fiber, the Web giant's one-gigabit broadband initiative in the US. Such technology will help the operators deploy gigabit broadband, saving them time and expense.
"This kind of a technology is really going to be an enabler of fibre-to-the-home," says Keith Russell, senior marketing manager, fixed networks business at Alcatel-Lucent. "Service providers will have another tool, addressing those parts of the network where it is hard to drive fibre right to the home, whether it is a multi-dwelling unit or where they can't trench fibre those last few meters."
Bell Labs delivers gigabits of data down the telephone wire by using more spectrum. VDSL2 uses 17MHz of spectrum while the first implementation of the emerging G.fast standard extends the frequency band to 106MHz. Alcatel-Lucent has gone beyond G.fast and uses even more spectrum: 350MHz for symmetrical 1 Gigabit, and up to 500MHz to demonstrate 10 Gigabit. Bell Labs calls its technology XG-FAST.
BT's chief executive, Gavin Patterson, has already described G.fast as a very exciting technology. "It allows us to get speeds of up to one-gigabit, and it builds on VDSL," said Patterson during BT's most recent quarterly results call. "It takes the fibre closer to the premise, so effectively you get a glass transmission closer to the premise but not always all the way in."
XG-FAST will take longer and will likely be commercially available only from 2018, says Teresa Mastrangelo, principal analyst at Broadbandtrends: "That timeline may still provide a quicker means to deploying gigabit services than having to deploy a full-blown fibre-to-the-home network."
Source: Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs
Using such a broad spectrum of the telephone wire, designed a century ago to carry voice signals several kilohertz wide, creates two challenges.
One is that signal attenuation grows with frequency. Hence the wider the spectrum, the shorter the copper loop length over which data can travel. VDSL2 has a loop-length of some 1,500 meters while XG-FAST achieves tens of meters.
The second issue is crosstalk, where the signal on a copper pair leaks into a neighbouring pair, generating electrical noise. The leakage can be so noisy at the higher frequencies that it can exceed the desired signal.
For the Bell Labs demonstration, crosstalk was only an issue in the 10-gigabit example that uses two wire pairs. However, for VDSL2 and for the emerging G.fast standard, crosstalk is a significant problem. Systems vendors have developed advanced digital signal processing techniques, known as vectoring, to reject such noise.
Russell says that the G.fast standard's first phase - based on 106MHz of spectrum - will be ratified by year end. G.fast's second phase proposes doubling the spectrum to 212MHz. Alcatel-Lucent demonstrations using XG-FAST shows that digital subscriber line technology need not stop there.
"A lot of work is needed to take it [XG-FAST] into production," says Russell. First, there are engineering challenges, the broad spectrum used makes the analogue front-end chip design significantly more complex and expensive. Engineering effort will be needed before the cost of such a solution will match that of VDSL.
XG-FAST would also need to be considered along with other proposals and the chosen outcome standardised before operators will embrace the technology in their networks. Meanwhile, operators will start testing G.fast from next year with products appearing mid-2015.
Another issue is the need for extensive copper characterisation in order to understand the state of the copper and whether it can even support this type of technology, says Mastrangelo.
"It will be very interesting to see what happens with G.fast given the operator interest in gigabit services," says Russell. "[G.fast] is a very strong option for operators wanting to offer such services quickly."
BT estimates that the technology is two years away before it will play a role in the network.
* The article was further edited and added to on July 16th.
G.fast adds to the broadband options of the service providers
Feature: G.fast
Source: Alcatel-Lucent
Competition is commonly what motivates service providers to upgrade their access networks. And operators are being given every incentive to respond. Cable operators are offering faster broadband rates and then there are initiatives such as Google Fiber.
Internet giant Google is planning 1 Gigabit fibre rollouts in up to 34 US cities covering 9 metro areas. The initiative prompted AT&T to issue its own list of 21 cities it is considering to offer a 1 Gigabit fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) service.
But delivering fibre all the way to the home is costly, and then there is the engineering time required to connect the home gateway to the network. Hence the operator interest in the emerging G.fast standard, the latest digital subscriber line (DSL) development that promises Gigabit rates using the telephone wire.
"G.fast eliminates the need to run fibre for the last 250 meters [to the home]," says Dudi Baum, CEO of Sckipio, an Israeli start-up developing G.fast chipsets. "Providing 1 Gigabit over a copper pair is cheaper and faster to deploy, compared to running fibre all the way."
For G.fast, you need the fibre closer to your house to get the Gigabit and that is not available today with most carriers
Until recently, operators faced a choice of whether to deploy FTTH or use fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) and VDSL to boost broadband rates. Now, such boundaries are disappearing, says Stefaan Vanhastel, marketing director for fixed networks, Alcatel-Lucent. Operators are more pragmatic in their deployments and are choosing the most suitable technology for a given deployment based on what is most cost effective and fastest to deploy.
"It is very much no longer black and white," agrees Julie Kunstler, principal analyst, components at market research firm, Ovum. "The same service providers will be supporting multiple access networks."
The advent of G.fast will enhance the operators' choice, boosting data rates while using existing copper to bridge the gap between the fibre and the home. But the technology is still some way off and views differs as to whether deployments will begin in 2015 or 2016.
"For G.fast, you need the fibre closer to your house to get the Gigabit and that is not available today with most carriers," says Arun Hiremath, director, marketing at DSL chip company, Ikanos Communications. It will likely start with some small scale deployments, he says, "but the carriers will wait a little more for things to mature".
G.fast
G.fast enables Gigabit rates over telephone wire by expanding the usable spectrum to 106MHz. This compares to the 17MHz spectrum used by VDSL2, the current most advanced deployed DSL standard. But adopting the wider spectrum exacerbates two local-loop characteristics that dictate DSL performance: signal attenuation and crosstalk.
Operating at higher frequencies induces signal attenuation, shortening the copper reach over which data can be sent. VDSL2 is deployed over 1,500m links typically, G.fast distances will more likely be 200m or less.
Dudi BaumCrosstalk refers to signal leakage between copper pairs in a cable bundle. A cable can be made up of tens or hundreds of copper twisted pairs. The leakages causes each twisted pair not only to carry the signal sent but also noise, the sum of the leakage components from neighbouring DSL pairs.
Crosstalk becomes more prominent the higher the frequency. "One reason why no one has developed G.fast technology until now is the challenge of handling crosstalk at the much higher frequencies," says Baum. Indeed, from G.fast field trials, observed crosstalk is so severe that from certain frequencies upwards, the interference is as strong as the received signal, says Paul Spruyt, DSL strategist for fixed networks at Alcatel-Lucent.
Vectoring
Vectoring is a technique use to tackle crosstalk and restore a line's data capacity. Vectoring uses digital signal processing to implement noise cancellation, and is already used for VDSL2. "Vectoring is considered a key aspect of G.fast, even more than for VDSL2," says Spruyt.
G.fast can be seen as a logical evolution of VDSL2 but there are also differences. Besides the wider 106MHz spectrum, G.fast has a different duplexing scheme. VDSL2 uses frequency-division duplexing (FDD) where the data transmission is continuous - upstream (from the home) and downstream - but on different frequency bands or tones. In contrast, G.fast uses time-division duplexing (TDD) where all the spectrum is used to either send data (upstream) or receive data.
If a cable carries both services to homes/ businesses, G.fast is started from the 17-106MHz band to avoid overlapping with VDSL2, since crosstalk cannot be cancelled between the two because of their differing duplexing schemes.
Paul Spruyt
Both DSL schemes use discrete multi-tone, where each tone carries data bits. But G.fast uses half the number of tones - 2,048 - with each tone 12 times the bandwidth of the tones used for VDSL2.
Operators can also configure the upstream and downstream ratio more easily using TDD. An 80 percent downstream/ 20 percent upstream is common to the home whereas businesses have symmetric data flows.
Only transmitting or only receiving also simplifies the G.fast analogue front-end circuitry since it is less susceptible to signal echo, whereas such an echo is an issue with VDSL2 due to the simultaneous sending and receiving of data.
Operators want G.fast to deliver 150 Megabit-per-second (Mbps) aggregate data rates over 250m, 200Mbps over 200m, 500Mbps over 100m and up to 1 Gigabit-per-second over shorter spans. This compares to VDSL2's 70Mbps (50Mbps downstream, 20Mbps upstream) over 400m. With vectoring, VDSL2 performance is doubled: 100Mbps downstream and 40Mbps for the same span.
Vectoring works by measuring the crosstalk coupling on each line before the DSLAM - the platform at the cabinet, or the fibre distribution point unit for G.fast - generates anti-noise to null each line's crosstalk.
The crosstalk coupling between the pairs is estimated using special modulated ‘sync’ symbols that are sent between data transmissions. A user's DSL modem expects to see the modulated sync symbol, but in reality receives the symbol distorted with crosstalk from modulated sync symbols transmitted on the neighbouring lines.
The modem measures the error – the crosstalk – and sends it to the DSLAM. The DSLAM correlates the received error values on the ‘victim’ line with the pilot sequences transmitted on all the other ‘disturber’ lines. This way, the DSLAM measures the crosstalk coupling for every disturber–victim pair. Anti-noise is then generated using a vectoring chip in the DSLAM, and injected into the victim line on top of the transmitted signal to cancel the crosstalk picked up, a process repeated for each line.
Such an approach is known as pre-coding: in the downstream direction anti-noise signals are generated and injected in the DSLAM before the signal is transmitted on the line. For the upstream, post-coding is used: the DSLAM generates and adds the anti-noise after reception of the signal distorted with crosstalk. In this case, the DSL modem sends modulated sync symbols and the DSLAM measures the error signal and performs the correlations and anti-noise calculations.
G.fast vectoring is more complex than vectoring for VDSL2.
Besides the strength of the crosstalk at higher frequencies, G.fast uses a power-saving mode that deactivates the line when no data is being sent. The vectoring algorithm must stop generating anti-noise each time the line is deactivated, while quickly generate anti-noise when transmission restarts. A VDSL2 modem line can also be deactivated but this is much less commonplace.
"The number of computations you need to do is proportional to the square of the number of lines," says Spruyt. For G.fast, the lines used are far less - 4 to 24 and even 48 in certain cases - because the G.fast mini-DSLAM is much closer to the home. For VDSL2, the number of lines can be 200 or 400.
However, the symbol rate of G.fast is related to the tone spacing and hence is 12 times faster than VDSL2. That requires faster calculation, but since G.fast has half the number of tones of VDSL2, and crosstalk cancellation is performed for each tone, the overall G.fast processing for G.fast is six times greater.
G.fast vectoring may thus be more complex but the overall computation - and power consumption - of the vectoring processor is lower than VDSL2 due to the fewer DSL lines.
We should expect the first generation of G.fast to consume more power than VDSL2 silicon
Chip developments
The G.fast analogue silicon requires much faster analogue-to-digital and digital-to-analogue converters due to the broader spectrum used, while the G.fast line drivers use a lower transmit power due to the shorter reach requirements. "We should expect the first generation of G.fast to consume more power than VDSL2 silicon," says Spruyt.
Stefaan Vanhastel
The main functional blocks for G.fast and VDSL2 include the baseband digital signal processor, vectoring, the analogue front end, and the line driver. The degree to which they are integrated in silicon - whether one chip or four if the home-gateway functions are included - depends on where they are used.
"The chipsets will be designed differently for the different segments where they are used," says Hiremath. For example, the G.fast modem could be implemented as a single chip that includes the baseband, home gateway, and even the line driver due to the short lengths involved, he says.
Moreover, while the G.fast standard does not require backward compatibility with VDSL2, there is nothing stopping chipmakers from supporting both. The same was true with VDSL2 yet the resulting chipsets also supported ADSL2.
Ikanos has yet to unveil its G.fast silicon but it has announced its Neos development platform for customers to test and trial the technology. Hiremath says its G.fast design is based on the Neos architecture and that it expects first samples later this year.
Start-up Sckipio has also to detail its G.fast silicon design but says it will provide more information in the coming months. G.fast has system requirements that are difficult to meet, says Baum: "The challenge is not to show the technology working but to meet the standard's boundary requirements with a small, efficient design that provides 1 Gigabit." By boundary conditions Baum is referring to performance requirements that the modem needs to achieve, such as certain speeds and distances with a given packet loss, for example.
Sckipio already has first samples of its silicon. The company ported the RTL design of its silicon onto a Cadence Palladium system - a box with hundreds of FPGAs that allows the complete hardware design to be built. The company also has DSL models - bundles of twisted copper pairs measured at greater than 200MHz - to test the design's performance. "We use those models to see the expected performance running our protocol over those wires," says Baum.
Alcatel-Lucent has developed its own vectoring know-how for VDSL2 and has now added G.fast. "Having our own vectoring technology means that we have our own vectoring processing," says Alcatel-Lucent's Vanhastel.
Alcatel-Lucent has conducted G.fast trials with A1 Telecom Austria. "The good news is that we have been able to show that with vectoring, you can get really close to single-user capacity; the same capacity you have if there is only a single user active on the line," says Vanhastel. In the trial using over 100m of cable, G.fast achieved 60Mbps due to crosstalk. "Activating G.fast vectoring it rose to 500Mbps - almost a factor of 10," he says.
Much work remains before G.fast is deployed in the network, says Alcatel-Lucent. The International Telecommunication Union's G.9701 G.fast physical layer document is 300 pages long and while consent has been achieved, approving the standard is expected to take the rest of the year. Interoperability, test, functionality and performance specifications are still to be written by the Broadband Forum and then there are regulatory issues to be overcome: G.fast's 106MHz spectrum overlaps with FM radio, for example.
Sckipio is more upbeat about timescales, believing operators will start deployments in 2015 due to competition including the cable operators. The start-up says it has multiple field trials of its G.fast silicon this year.
Meanwhile, extending the spectrum to 212MHz is the next logical step in the development of G.fast. "Bonding is another concept that could be applied," says Spruyt.
There is life in the plain old telephone service yet.
This is an extended version of an article that first appeared in New Electronics, click here.