Infinera goes multi-terabit with its latest photonic IC
In his new book, The Great Acceleration, Robert Colvile discusses how things we do are speeding up.
In 1845 it took U.S. President James Polk six months to send a message to California. Just 15 years later Abraham Lincoln's inaugural address could travel the same distance in under eight days, using the Pony Express. But the use of ponies for transcontinental communications was shortlived once the electrical telegraph took hold. [1]
The relentless progress in information transfer, enabled by chip advances and Moore's law, is taken largely for granted. Less noticed is the progress being made in integrated photonic chips, most notably by Infinera.
In 2000, optical transport sent data over long-haul links at 10 gigabit-per-second (Gbps), with 80 such channels supported in a platform. Fifteen years later, Infinera demonstrated its latest-generation photonic integrated circuit (PIC) and FlexCoherent DSP-ASIC that can transmit data at 600Gbps over 12,000km, and up to 2.4 terabit-per-second (Tbps) - three times the data capacity of a state-of-the-art dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) platform back in 2000 - over 1,150km.
Infinite Capacity Engine
Infinera dubs its latest optoelectronic subsystem the Infinite Capacity Engine. The subsystem comprises a pair of indium-phosphide PICs - a transmitter and a receiver - and the FlexCoherent DSP-ASIC. The performance capabilities that the Infinite Capacity Engine enables were unveiled by Infinera in January with its Advanced Coherent Toolkit announcement. Now, to coincide with OFC 2016, Infinera has detailed the underlying chips that enable the toolkit. And company product announcements using the new hardware will be made later this year, says Pravin Mahajan, the company's director of product and corporate marketing.
The claimed advantages of the Infinite Capacity Engine include a 82 percent reduction in power consumption compared to a system using discrete optical components and a dozen 100-gigabit coherent DSP-ASICs, and a 53 percent reduction in total-cost-of-ownership compared to competing dense WDM platforms. The FlexCoherent chip also features line rate data encryption.
"The Infinite Capacity Engine is the industry's first multi-terabit it super-channel, says Mahajan. "It also delivers the industry's first multi-terabit layer one encryption."
Multi-terabit PIC
Infinera's first transmitter and receiver PIC pair, launched in 2005, supported 10, 10-gigabit channels and implemented non-coherent optical transmission.
In 2011 Infinera introduced a 500-gigabit super-channel coherent PIC pair used with Infinera's DTN-X platforms and also its Cloud Xpress data centre interconnect platform launched in 2014. The 500 Gigabit design implemented 10, 50 gigabit channels that implemented polarisation-multiplexed, quadrature phase-shift keying (PM-QPSK) modulation. The accompanying FlexCoherent DSP-ASIC was implemented using a 40nm CMOS process node and support a symbol rate of 16 gigabaud.
The PIC design has since been enhanced to also support additional modulation schemes such as as polarisation-multiplexed, binary phase-shift keying (PM-BPSK) and 3 quadrature amplitude modulation (PM-3QAM) that extend the DTN-X's ultra long-haul performance.
In 2015 Infinera also launched the oPIC-100, a 100-gigabit PIC for metro applications that enables Infinera to exploit the concept of sliceable bandwidth by pairing oPIC-100s with a 500 gigabit PIC. Here the full 500 gigabit super-channel capacity can be pre-deployed even if not all of the capacity is used. Using Infinera's time-based instant bandwidth feature, part of that 500 gigabit capacity can be added between nodes in a few hours based on a request for greater bandwidth.
Now, with the Infinite Capacity Engine PIC, the effective number of channels has been expanded to 12, each capable of supporting a range of modulation techniques (see table below) and data rates. In fact, Infinera uses multiple Nyquist sub-carriers spread across each of the 12 channels. By encoding the data across multiple sub-carriers a lower-baud rate can be used, increasing the tolerance to non-linear channel impairments during optical transmission.
Mahajan says the latest PIC has a power consumption similar to its current 500 Gigabit super-channel PIC but because the photonic design supports up to 2.4 terabit, the power consumption in gigabit-per-Watt is reduced by 70 percent.
FlexCoherent encryption
The latest FlexCoherent DSP-ASIC is Infinera's most complex yet. The 1.6 billion transistor 28nm CMOS IC can process two channels, and supports a 33 gigabaud symbol rate. As a result, six DSP-ASICs are used with the 12-channel PIC.
It is the DSP-ASIC that enables the various elements of the advanced coherent toolkit that includes improved soft-decision forward error correction. "The net coding gain is 11.9dB, up 0.9 dB, which improves the capacity-reach," says Mahajan. Infinera says the ultra long-haul performance has also been improved from 9,500km to over 12,000km.
Source: Infinera
The DSP also features layer one encryption implementing the 256-bit Advanced Encryption Standard (AES-256). Infinera says the request for encryption is being led by the Internet content providers but wholesale operators and co-location providers also want to secure transmissions between sites.
Infinera introduced layer two MACsec encryption with its Cloud Xpress platform. This encrypts the Ethernet payload but not the header. With layer one encryption, it is the OTN frames that are encoded. "When we get down to the OTN level, everything is encrypted," says Mahajan. An operator can choose to encrypt the entire super-channel or encrypt at the service level, down to the ODU0 (1.244 Gbps) level.
System benefits
Using the Infinite Capacity Engine, the transmission capacity over a fibre increases from 9.5 terabit to up to 26.4 terabit.
And with the newest PIC, Infinera can expand the sliceable transponder concept for metro-regional applications. The 2.4 terabits of capacity can be pre-deployed and new capacity turned up between nodes. "You can suddenly turn up 200 gigabit for a month or two, rent and then return it," says Mahajan. However, to support the full 2.4 terabits of capacity, the PIC at the other end of the link would also need to support 16-QAM.
Infinera does say there will be other Infinite Capacity Engine variants. "There will be specific engines for specific markets, and we would choose a subset of the modulations," says Mahajan.
One obvious platform that will benefit from the first Infinite Capacity Engine is the DTN-X. Another that will likely use an ICE variant is Infinera's Cloud Xpress. At present Infinera integrates its 500-gigabit PIC in a 2 rack-unit box for data centre interconnect applications. By using the new PIC and implementing PM-16QAM, the line-side capacity per rack unit of a second-generation Cloud Xpress would rise from 250 gigabit to 1.2 terabit. And with layer one encryption, the MACsec IC may no longer be needed.
Mahajan says the Infinite Capacity Engine has already been tested in the Telstra trial detailed in January. "We have already proven its viability but it is not deployed and carrying live traffic," he says.
Ovum Q&A: Infinera as an end-to-end systems vendor
Infinera hosted an Insight analyst day on October 6th to highlight its plans now that it has acquired metro equipment player, Transmode. Gazettabyte interviewed Ron Kline, principal analyst, intelligent networks at market research firm, Ovum, who attended the event.
Q. Infinera’s CEO Tom Fallon referred to this period as a once-in-a-decade transition as metro moves from 10 Gig to 100 Gig. The growth is attributed mainly to the uptake of cloud services and he expects this transition to last for a while. Is this Ovum’s take?
Ron Kline, OvumRK: It is a transition but it is more about coherent technology rather than 10 Gig to 100 Gig. Coherent enables that higher-speed change which is required because of the level of bandwidth going on in the metro.
We are going to see metro change from 10 Gig to 100 Gig, much like we saw it change from 2.5 Gig to 10 Gig. Economically, it is going to be more feasible for operators to deploy 100 Gig and get more bang for their buck.
Ten years is always a good number from any transition. If you look at SONET/SDH, it began in the early 1990s and by 2000 was mainstream.
If you look at transitions, you had a ten-year time lag to get from 2.5 Gig to 10 Gig and you had another ten years for the development of 40 Gig, although that was impacted by the optical bubble and the [2008] financial crisis. But when coherent came around, you had a three-year cycle for 100 gigabit. Now you are in the same three-year cycle for 200 and 400 gigabit.
Is 100 Gig the unit of currency? I think all logic tells us it is. But I’m not sure that ends up being the story here.
If you get line systems that are truly open then optical networking becomes commodity-based transponders - the white box phenomenon - then where is the differentiation? It moves into the software realm and that becomes a much more important differentiator.
Infinera’s CEO asserted that technology differentiation has never been more important in this industry. Is this true or only for certain platforms such as for optical networking and core routers?
If you look at Infinera, you would say their chief differentiator is the PIC (photonic integrated circuit) as it has enabled them to do very well. But other players really have not tried it. Huawei does a little but only in the metro and access.
It is true that you need differentiation, particularly for something as specialised as optical networking. The edge has always gone to the company that can innovate quickest. That is how Nortel did it; they were first with 10 gigabit for long haul and dominated the market.
When you look at coherent, the edge has gone to the quickest: Ciena, Alcatel-Lucent, Huawei and to a certain extent Infinera. Then you throw in the PIC and that gives Infinera an edge.
But then, on the flip side, there is this notion of disaggregation. Nobody likes to say it but it is the commoditisation of the technology; that is certainly the way the content providers are going.
If you get line systems that are truly open then optical networking becomes commodity-based transponders - the white box phenomenon - then where is the differentiation? It moves into the software realm and that becomes a much more important differentiator.
I do think differentiation is important; it always is. But I’m not sure how long your advantage is these days.
Infinera argues that the acquisition of Transmode will triple the total available market it can address.
Infinera definitely increases its total available market. They only had an addressable market related to long haul and submarine line terminating equipment. Now this [acquisition of Transmode] really opens the door. They can do metro, access, mobile backhaul; they can do a lot of different things.
We don’t necessarily agree with the numbers, though, it more a doubling of the addressable market.
The rolling annual long-haul backbone global market (3Q 2014 to 2Q 2015) and the submarine line terminating equipment market where they play [pre-Transmode] was $5.2 billion. If you assume the total market of $14.2 billion is addressable then yes it is nearly a tripling but that includes the legacy SONET/SDH and Bandwidth Management segments which are rapidly declining. Nevertheless, Tom’s point is well-taken, adding a further $5.8 billion for the metro and access WDM markets to their total addressable market is significant.
Tom Fallon also said vendor consolidation will continue, and companies will need to have scale because of the very large amounts of R&D needed to drive differentiation. Is scale needed for a greater R&D spend to stay ahead of the competition?
When you respond to an operator’s request-for-proposal, that is where having end-to-end scale helps Infinera; being able to be a one-stop shop for the metro and long haul.
If I’m an operator, I don’t have to get products from several vendors and be the systems integrator.
Infinera announced a new platform for long haul, the XT-500, which is described as a telecom version of its data centre interconnect Cloud Xpress platform. Why do service providers want such a platform, and how does it differ from cloud Xpress?
Infinera’s DTN-X long haul platform is very high capacity and there are applications where you don’t need a such a large platform. That is one application.
The other is where you lease space [to house your equipment]. If I am going to lease space, if I have a box that is 2 RU (rack unit) high and can do 500 gigabit point-to-point and I don’t need any cross-connect, then this smaller shelf size makes a lot of sense. I’m just transporting bandwidth.
Cloud Xpress is a scaled-down product for the metro. The XT-500 is carrier-class, e.g. NEBS [Network Equipment-Building System] compliant and can span long-haul distances.
Infinera has also announced the XTC-2. What is the main purpose of this platform?
The platform is a smaller DTN-X variant to serve smaller regions. For example you can take a 500 gigabit PIC super-channel and slice it up. That enables you to do a hub-and-spoke virtual ring and drop 100 Gig wavelengths at appropriate places. The system uses the new metro PICs introduced in March. At the hub location you use an ePIC that slices up the 500G into individually routable 100G channels and at the hub location, where the XTC-2 is, you use an oPIC-100.
Does the oPIC-100 offer any advantage compared to existing100 Gig optics?
I don’t think it has a huge edge other than the differentiation you get from a PIC. In fact it might be a deterrent: you have to buy it from Infinera. It is also anti-trend, where the trend is pluggables.
But the hub and spoke architecture is innovative and it will be interesting to see what they do with the integration of PIC technology in Transmode’s gear.
Acquiring Transmode provides Infinera with an end-to-end networking portfolio? Does it still lack important elements? For example, Ciena acquired Cyan and gained its Blue Planet SDN software.
Transmode has a lot of different technologies required in the metro: mobile back-haul, synchronisation, they are also working on mobile front-hauling, and their hardware is low power.
Transmode has pretty much everything you need in these smaller platforms. But it is the software piece that they don’t have. Infinera has a strategy that says: we are not going to do this; we are going to be open and others can come in through an interface essentially and run our equipment.
That will certainly work.
But if you take a long view that says that in future technology will be commoditised, then you are in a bad spot because all the value moves to the software and you, as a company, are not investing and driving that software. So, this could be a huge problem going forward.
What are the main challenges Infinera faces?
One challenge, as mentioned, is hardware commoditisation and the issue of software.
Hardware commodity can play in Infinera’s favour. Infinera should have the lowest-cost solution given its integrated solution, so large hardware volumes is good for them. But if pluggable optics is a requirement, then they could be in trouble with this strategy
The other is keeping up with the Joneses.
I think the 500 Gig in 100 Gig channels is now not that exciting. The 500 Gig PIC is not creating as much advantage as it did before. Where is the 1.2 terabit PIC? Where is the next version that drives Infinera forward?
And is it still going to be 100 Gig? They are leading me to believe it won’t just be. Are they going to have a PIC that is 12 channels that are tunable in modulation formats to go from 100 to 200 to 400 Gig.
They need to if they want to stay competitive with everyone else because the market is moving to 200 Gig and 400 Gig. Our figures show that over 2,000 multi-rate (QPSK and 16-QAM) ports have been shipped in the last year (3Q 2014 to 2Q 2015). And now you have 8-QAM coming. Infinera’s PIC is going to have to support this.
Infinera’s edge is the PIC but if you don’t keep progressing the PIC, it is no longer an edge.
These are the challenges facing Infinera and it is not that easy to do these things.
Infinera introduces flexible grid 500G super-channel ROADM
An example showing the impact of a 500G super-channel ROADM node. Source: Infinera
"The FlexROADM will open up the Tier-1 operators in a way Infinera has not been able to do before," says Dana Cooperson, vice president, network infrastructure at market research firm, Ovum. "The DTN-X was necessary but not sufficient; the ROADM is the last piece."
The FlexROADM is claimed to deliver two industry firsts: it can add and drop flexible-grid-based 500 Gig super-channels, and uses the Internet Engineering Task Force’s (IETF) spectrum switched optical networks (SSON).
"SSON is the next generation of WSON [Wavelength Switched Optical Network control plane], except it manages spectrum," says Ron Kline, principal analyst, network infrastructure also at Ovum.
The DTN-X platform combines Infinera's 500 Gig photonic integrated circuits and OTN (Optical Transport Network) switching. With the FlexROADM, Infinera has added switching at the optical layer in 500 Gig increments. Infinera can now offer enhanced multi-layer network optimisation with the combination of electrical and optical switching.
"Optical bypass before was manual using patch cords, now operators can reconfigure with the FlexROADM," says Kline. "It also provides new optical restoration capabilities that Infinera did not have."
The FlexROADM supports up to nine degrees, and is available in colourless, colourless and directionless, and full colourless, directionless and contentionless (CDC) versions.
"The debate about contentionless continues," says Kline. "It is safe to assume that for the majority of applications flexible grid, colourless and directionless will be the high runner." Contentionless will be used by the big carriers, he says, but in certain locations only.
Infinera says the line system announced will support up to 24 Terabit-per-second (Tbps) when it ships in September. The maximum long-haul capacity using its current PM-QPSK super-channels is 9.5Tbps per fibre pair.
"In the future when we enable metro-reach super-channels using PM-16-QAM, they will support 24 Terabit-per-second per fibre pair using the line system we are announcing," says Geoff Bennett, director, solutions and technology at Infinera.
Bennett says the data rate and the spectral efficiency for a given sub-carrier can be varied depending on the reach required. The spacing between sub-carriers that make up a super-channel also can be varied depending on reach. Many different transmission possibilities exist, says Bennett, but to explain the concept, he cites two examples.
The 24Tbps capacity with PM-16-QAM modulation uses pulse shaping at the transmitter to achieve 'Nyquist DWDM' channel spacing, the spacing between channels that approximates the baud rate, says Bennett.
"At this time we are not disclosing the details of the channel spacing, or the number of sub-carriers used by our future line modules," says Bennett. "But the total super-channel spectral width is the equivalent of 200GHz if you are transmitting a one Terabit super-channel, for example." This equates to a spectral efficiency of 5b/s/Hz, and using 16-QAM, the reach achieved will be 600-700km.
"The system we have just launched is designed to operate in long-haul networks and uses PM-QPSK," says Bennett. "For an ultra long-haul reach requirement of 4,500km, the super-channel comprises ten sub-carriers; a total of 500 Gbps over a spectral width of 250 GHz." These line cards are available now, he says.
Infinera continues to make steady market progress, according to Ovum. The company is in the top 10 system vendors globally, while in backbone and 100 Gigabit, Infinera is fourth.
SDN starts to fulfill its network optimisation promise
Infinera, Brocade and ESnet demonstrate the use of software-defined networking to provision and optimise traffic across several networking layers.
Infinera, Brocade and network operator ESnet are claiming a first in demonstrating software-defined networking (SDN) performing network provisioning and optimisation using platforms from more than one vendor.
Mike Capuano, Infinera
The latest collaboration is one of several involving optical vendors that are working to extend SDN to the WAN. ADVA Optical Networking and IBM are working to use SDN to connect data centres, while Ciena and partners have created a test bed to develop SDN technology for the WAN.
The latest lab-based demonstration uses ESnet's circuit reservation platform that requests network resources via an SDN controller. ESnet, the US Department of Energy's Energy Sciences Network, conducts networking R&D and operates a large 100 Gigabit network linking research centres and universities. The SDN controller, the open source Floodlight Project design, oversees the network comprising Brocade's 100 Gigabit MLXe IP router and Infinera's DTN-X platform.
The goal of provisioning and optimising traffic across the routing, switching and optical layers has been a work in progress for over a decade. System vendors have undertaken initiatives such as External Network-Network Interface (ENNI) and multi-domain GMPLS but with limited success. "They have been talked about, experimented with, but have never really made it out of the labs," says Mike Capuano, vice president of corporate marketing at Infinera. "SDN has the opportunity to solve this problem for real."
"In the world of Web 2.0, the general approach is not to sit and wait till standards are done, but to prototype, test, find the gaps, report back, and do it again"
"SDN, and technologies like the OpenFlow protocol, allow all of the resources of the entire network to be abstracted to this higher level control," says Daniel Williams, director of product marketing for data center and service provider routing at Brocade.
Daniel William, BrocadeInfinera and ESnet demonstrated OpenFlow provisioning transport resources a year ago. This latest demonstration has OpenFlow provisioning at the packet and optical layers and performing network optimisation. "We have added more carrier-grade capabilities," says Capuano. "Not just provisioning, but now we have topology discovery and network configuration."
“The demonstration is a positive step in the development of SDN because it showcases the multi-layer transport provisioning and management that many operators consider the prime use case for transport SDN,” says Rick Talbot, principal analyst, optical infrastructure at Current Analysis. "The demonstration’s real-time network optimisation is an excellent example of the potential benefits of transport SDN, leveraging SDN to minimise transit traffic carried at the router layer, saving both CapEx and OpEx."
Using such an SDN setup, service providers can request high-bandwidth links to meet specific networking requirements. "There can be a request from a [software] app: 'I need a 80 Gigabit flow for two days from Switzerland to California with a 95ms latency and zero packet loss'," says Capuano. "The fact that the network has the facility to set that service up and deliver on those parameters automatically is a huge saving."
Such a link can be established the same day of the request being made, even within minutes. Traditionally, such requests involving the IP and optical layers - and different organisations within a service provider - can take weeks to fulfill, says Infinera.
Current Analysis also highlights another potential benefit of the demonstration: how the control of separate domains - the Infinera wavelength and TDM domain and the Brocade layer 2/3 domain - with a common controller illustrates how SDN can provide end-to-end multi-operator, multi-vendor control of connections.
What next
The Open Networking Foundation (ONF) has an Optical Transport Working Group that is tasked with developing OpenFlow extensions to enable SDN control beyond the packet layer to include optical.
How is the optical layer in the demonstration controlled given the ONF work is unfinished?
"Our solution leverages Web 2.0 protocols like RESTful and JSON integrated into the Open Transport Switch [application] that runs on the DTN-X," says Capuano. "In the world of Web 2.0, the general approach is not to sit and wait till standards are done, but to prototype, test, find the gaps, report back, and do it again."
Further work is needed before the demonstration system is robust enough for commercial deployment.
"This is going to take some time: 2014 is the year of test and trials in the carrier WAN while 2015 is when you will see production deployment," says Capuano. "If service providers are making decision on what platforms they want to deploy, it is important to chose ones that are going to position them well to move to SDN when the time comes."
Ovum on Infinera's Intelligent Transport Network strategy
Infinera announced that TeliaSonera International Carrier (TSIC) is extending the use of its DTN-X to its European network, having already adopted the platform in the US. Infinera has also outlined the next evolution in its networking strategy, dubbed the Intelligent Transport Network.
Dana Cooperson
Gazettabyte asked Dana Cooperson, vice president and practice leader, and Ron Kline, principal analyst, both in the network infrastructure group at market research firm, Ovum, about the announcement and Infinera's outlined strategy.
What has been announced
TSIC is adding Infinera's DTN-X to boost network capacity in Europe and accommodate its own growing IP traffic. TSIC already has deployed 100 Gig technology in its European network, using a Coriant product. The wholesale operator will sell 100 Gig services, activating capacity using the DTN-X's 'instant bandwidth' feature based on already-lit 100 Gig light paths that make up its 500 Gigabit super-channels.
Meanwhile, Infinera has detailed its Intelligent Transport Network strategy that extends its digital optical network that performs optical-electrical-optical (OEO) conversion using its 500 Gig photonic integrated circuits (PICs) coupled with OTN (Optical Transport Network) switching to include additional features. These include multi-layer switching – reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers (ROADMs) and MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) – and PICs with terabit capacity
Q&A with Dana Cooperson and Ron Kline
Q. What is significant about Infinera's Intelligent Transport Network strategy?
Dana C: Infinera is being more public about its longer-term strategy - to 2020 - which includes evolving from its digital optical network messaging to a network that includes multiple layers and types of switching, and more automation. Infinera is not announcing more functionality availability now.
Infinera makes much play about its 500 Gig super-channels. More recently it has detailed such platform features as instant bandwidth and Fast Shared Mesh Protection supported in hardware. Are these features giving operators something new and is Infinera gaining market share as a result?
Dana C: Instant Bandwidth provides a way for Infinera’s operator customers to have their cake and eat it. They can install 500 Gig super-channels ahead of demand, and not pay for each 100 Gig sub-channel until they have a need for that bandwidth. It is a simple process at that point to 'turn on' the next 100 Gig worth of bandwidth within the super-channel.
By installing all five 100 Gig channels at once, the operator can simplify operations - lower opex - and allow quicker time-to-revenue without having to take the capex hit until the bandwidth needs materialise. This is an improvement over the DTN platform, which gave customers the 10x10 Gig architecture to let them pre-position bandwidth before the need for it materialised and save on opex, but at the cost of higher up-front capex than was ideal.
Talking to TSIC confirm that this added flexibility the DTN-X provides has allowed them to win wholesale business from competitors while tying capex more directly to revenue.
Ron K: Although pay-as-you go capability is available, analysis of 100 Gig shipments to date indicate most customers are paying for all five up front.
Dana C: I have not directly talked with an Infinera customer that has confirmed the benefit of Fast Shared Mesh Protection, but the feature certainly seems to be of value to customers and prospects. Our research indicates the continued search for better, more efficient mesh protection. Hardware-enabled protection should provide better latency (higher speed).
Ron K: Resiliency and mesh protection are critical requirements if you want to participate in the market. Shared mesh assumes that you have idle protection capacity available in case there is a failure. That is expensive. However, with Infinera’s technology - the PIC and Instant Bandwidth - it is not as difficult.
Restoration is all about speed – how fast can you get the network back up. It is not always milliseconds, sometimes it is half a minute. But during catastrophic failure events such as an earthquake, where a user can loose entire nodes, 30 seconds may not be so bad. Infinera has implemented the switch in hardware, based on a pre-planned map, so it is quicker.
Dana C: As for what impact these capabilities are having on market share, Infinera has climbed to the No.3 player in 100 Gig DWDM in three quarters since the DTN-X has become available.
They’ve jumped back up to No.4 globally in backbone WDM/CPO-T (converged packet optical transport) after sinking to sixth when they were losing share because they were without a viable 40 Gig solution. They made the right call at that time to focus on 100 Gig systems based on the 500 Gig PIC rather than chase 40 Gig. They are both keeping and expanding with existing DTN customers, TSIC being one, and picking up new customers.
Ron Kline
Ron K:They are definitely picking up share. However, I’m not sure if they can sustain it. The reason for the share jump is they are selling 100 Gig, five at a time. Remember, most customers elect to pay for all five. That means future sales will lag because customers have pre-positioned the bandwidth.
Looking at the customers is probably a better indicator: Infinera has some 27 customers, maybe 30 by now, which provide a good embedded base. Still, 27 customers is low compared to Ciena, Alcatel-Lucent, Huawei and even Cisco.
When Infinera first announced the DTN-X in 2011 it talked about how it would add MPLS support. Now outlining its Intelligent Transport Network strategy it has still to announce MPLS support. Do operators not need this network feature yet in such platforms and if not, why?
Dana C: The market is still sorting out exactly what is needed for sub-wavelength switching and where it is needed. Cisco’s and Juniper’s approaches are very different in the routing world —essentially, a lower-cost MPLS blade for the CRS versus a whole new box in the PTX; there is no right way there.
Within packet-aware optical products, the same is true: What is the right level of integration of OTN versus MPLS? It depends on where you are in the network, what that carrier’s service mix is, and how fast the mix is changing.
Many carriers are still struggling with their rigid organisational structures, and how best to manage products that are optical and packet in equal measure. So I don’t think Infinera is late, they are just reacting to their customers’ priorities and doing other things first.
Ron K: This is the $64,000 question: MPLS versus OTN. I’m not sure how it will eventually play out. I am asking service providers now.
OTN is a carrier protocol developed for carriers by carriers (the replacement for SONET/SDH). They will be the ones to use it because they have multi-service networks and need the transparency OTN provides. Google types and cable operators will not use OTN switching - they will lean towards the label-switched path (LSP) route. Even Tier-1 operators who have both types of networks will most likely maintain separation.
"The trick is to optimise around the requirements that net you the biggest total available market and which maximise your strengths and minimise your weaknesses. You can’t be all things to all carriers."
If Infinera has its digital optical network, why is it now also talking about ROADMs? And does having both benefit operators?
Dana C: Yes, having both benefits operators. From discussions with Infinera's customers, it is true that the digital nodes give them flexibility, but they do introduce added cost. For those nodes where customers have little need to add/ drop traffic, a ROADM would provide a more cost-efficient option to a node that performs OEO for all the traffic. So, with a ROADM option customers would have more control over node design.
Infinera talks about its next-gen PICs that will support a Terabit and more. After nearly a decade of making PICs, how does Ovum view the significance of the technology?
Dana C: While more vendors are doing photonic integration R&D, and some - Huawei comes to mind - have released some PIC-based products, no one has come close to Infinera in what it can do with photonic integration. Speaking with quite a few of Infinera’s customers, they are very happy with the technology, the system, and the support.
Each generation of PIC requires a significant R&D effort, but it does provide differentiation. Infinera has managed to stay focused and implement on time and on spec. I see them as the epitome of a “specialist” vendor. They are of similar size to Coriant and Tellabs, which have seen their fortunes wane, and ADVA Optical Networking. So I would say they are a very good example of what focus and differentiation can do.
Now, is the PIC the only way to approach system architecture? No. As noted before, some Infinera clients have told me that the lack of a ROADM has hurt them in competitive situations, as did the need to pay for all the pre-positioned bandwidth up front (true for the DTN, not the DTN-X).
From my days in product development, I know you have to optimise around a set of requirements, and the trick is to optimise around the requirements that net you the biggest total available market and which maximise your strengths and minimise your weaknesses. You can’t be all things to all carriers.
What is significant about the latest TeliaSonera network win and what does it mean for Coriant?
Dana C: Infinera is announcing an extension of its deployments at TSIC from North America to now include Europe as well. When you ask what this means to Coriant, their incumbent supplier in Europe, the answer is not clear cut. This gives Infinera an expanded hunting licence and it gives Coriant some cause for worry.
TSIC values both vendors and both will have their place in the European network. TSIC plans to use the vendors in different regions.
I am sure TSIC will try and play each off against the other to get the best price. It is looking for more flexibility and some healthy competition.
Infinera speeds up network restoration
- Claimed to be the only hardware implementation of the Shared Mesh Protection protocol
- Provides network-wide protection against multiple network failures
- The chip is already within the DTN-X system; protocol will be activated this year
Pravin Mahajan, Infinera
Infinera has developed a chip to speed up network restoration following faults.
The chip implements the Shared Mesh Protection (SMP) protocol being developed by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and Infinera believes it is the only vendor with hardware acceleration of the protocol.
The SMP standard is still being worked on and will be completed this year. Infinera demonstrated its hardware SMP implementation at OFC/NFOEC 2013 and will activate the scheme in operators' networks using a platform software upgrade this year.
The chip, dubbed Fast Shared Mesh Protection (FastSMP), is sprinkled across cards within Infinera's DTN-X platform and will be linked to other FastSMP ICs across the network. The FastSMP chips exchange signalling information and use internal look-up tables with pre-calculated routing data to determine the required protection action when one or more network failures occur.
Network faults
The causes of network faults range from fibre cuts from construction work to natural disasters such as Hurricane Sandy and the Asia Pacific tsunami. Level 3 Communications cited in 2011 that squirrels were the second most common cause of fibre cuts after construction work. The squirrels, chewing through fibre, accounted for 17 percent of all cuts. Meanwhile, one Indian service provider says it experiences 100 fibre cuts nationwide each day, according to Infinera.
Operators are also having to share their network maps with enterprises that want to assess the risk based on geography before choosing a service provider. "End customers no longer necessarily trust the service level agreements they have with operators," says Pravin Mahajan, director, corporate marketing and messaging at Infinera. In riskier regions, for example those prone to earthquakes, enterprises may choose two operators. "A form of 1+1 protection,” says Mahajan.
Operators want resilient networks that adapt to faults quickly, ideally within 50ms, without adding extra cost.
Traditional resiliency schemes include SONET/SDH’s 1+1 protection. This meets the sub-50ms requirement but addresses single faults only and requires dedicated back-up for each circuit. At the IP/MPLS (Internet Protocol/ Multiprotocol Label Switching) layer, the MPLS Fast Re-Route scheme caters for multiple failures and is sub-50ms. But it only addresses local faults, not the full network. And being packet-based - at a higher layer of the network - the scheme is costlier to implement.
"End customers no longer necessarily trust the service level agreements they have with operators"
Infinera's protection scheme uses its digital optical networking approach based on its photonic integrated circuits (PICs) coupled with Optical Transport Networking (OTN). OTN resides between the packet and optical layers, and using a mesh network topology, it can handle multiple failures. By sharing bandwidth at the transport layer, the approach is cheaper than at the packet layer. But being software-based, restoration takes seconds.
Infinera has speeded up the scheme by implementing SMP with its chip such that it meets the 50ms goal.
FastSMP chip
Infinera plans for multiple failures using the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) control plane. “The same intelligence is now implemented in hardware [using the FastSMP processor],” says Mahajan.
The chip is on each 500 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) line card, within the platform's OTN switch fabric, the client side and as part of the controller. The FastSMP, described as a co-processor to the CPU, hosts look-up tables with rules as to what should happen with each failure. The chips, located in the platform and across the network, then adjust to the back-up plan for each service failure.
Infinera says that the protection is at the service level not at the link level. "It does this at ODU [OTN's optical data unit] granularity," says Mahajan; each circuit can hold different sized services, 2.5 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) or 10Gbps for example, all carried within a 100Gbps light path. "By defining failure scenarios on a per-service basis, you now need to put all these entries in hardware," says Mahajan.
To program the chip, network failures are simulated using Infinera's network planning tool to determine the required back-up schemes. These can be chosen based on shortest path or lowest latency, for example.
The GMPLS control plane protocol determines the rules as to how the network should be adapted and these are written on-chip. When a failure occurs, the chip detects the failure and performs the required actions.
The FastSMP chip is already on all the DTN-X line cards Infinera has shipped and will be enabled using software upgrade.
The GMPLS control plane recomputes backup paths after a failure has occurred. Typically no action is required but if several failures occur, the new GMPLS backup paths will be distributed to update the FastSMPs' tables. "Only on the third or fourth failure typically will a new backup plan be needed," says Mahajan.
In effect, the more meshed the network topology, the greater the number of failures that can be tolerated. "When you have three or four failures, you need to have new computation at the GMPLS control plane and then it can repopulate the backups for failures 3, 4, and 5," he says.
Instant bandwidth and FastSMP
Infinera is able to turn up bandwidth in real-time using its 500Gbps super-channel PIC. "We slice up the 500 Gig capacity available per line card into 100 Gig chunks," says Mahajan.
This feature, combined with FastSMP, aids operators dealing with failures once traffic is rerouted. The next backup route, if it is close to its full capacity, can have an extra 100 Gigabit of capacity added in case the link is called into use.
A study based on an example 80-node network by ACG Research estimates that the Shared Mesh Protection scheme uses 30 percent less line-side ports compared to an equivalent network implementing the 1+1 protection scheme.
Infinera adds software to its PIC for instant bandwidth
Infinera has enabled its DTN-X platform to deliver rapidly 100 Gigabit services. The ability to fulfill capacity demand quickly is seen as a competitive advantage by operators. Gazettabyte spoke with Infinera and TeliaSonera International Carrier, a DTN-X customer, about the merits of its 'instant bandwidth' and asked several industry analysts for their views.
Infinera has added a WDM line card hosting its 500 Gigabit super-channel photonic integrated circuit to its DTN-X platform
Pravin Mahajan, Infinera.
Infinera is claiming an industry first with the software-enablement of 100 Gigabit capacity increments. The company's DTN-X platform's 'instant bandwidth' feature shortens the time to add new capacity in the network, from weeks as is common today to less than a day.
The ability to add bandwidth as required is increasingly valued by operators. TeliaSonera International Carrier points out that its traffic demands are increasingly variable, making capacity requirements harder to forecast and manage.
"It [the DTN-X's instant bandwidth] enables us to activate 100 Gig services between network spans to manage our own IP traffic which is growing rapidly," says Ivo Pascucci, head of sales, Americas at TeliaSonera International Carrier. "We will also be able to sell in the market 100 Gig services and activate the capacity much more rapidly."
What has been done
Infinera has added three elements to enable its DTN-X platform to enable 100 Gigabit services.
One is a new wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) line card that features its 500 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) super-channel photonic integrated circuit (PIC). Infinera says the line card has 500Gbps of capacity enabled, of which only 100Gbps is activated. "The remaining 400Gbps is latent, waiting to be activated," says Pravin Mahajan, director of corporate marketing and messaging at Infinera.
Infinera uses the DTN-X's Optical Transport Network (OTN) switch fabric to pack the client side signals onto any of the 100Gbps channels activated on the line side. This capacity pool of up to 500 Gbps, says Infinera, results in better usage of backbone capacity compared to traditional optical networking equipment based on individual 100Gbps 'siloed' channels.
A software application has also been added to Infinera's network management system, the digital network administrator (DNA), to activate the 100Gbps capacity increments.
Lastly, Infinera has in place a just-in-time system that enables client-side 10 Gigabit Ethernet optical transceivers to be delivered to customers within 10 days, if they out of stock. Infinera says it is achieving a 6-day delivery time in 95% of the cases.
Advantages
TeliaSonera International Carrier confirms the advantages to having 100 Gigabit capacities pre-provisioned and ready for use.
"Having the ability to turn up large bandwidth is critical to our business, especially as the [traffic] numbers continue to grow"
Ivo Pascucci, TeliaSonera International Carrier
"If it is individual line cards across the network when you have as many PoPs as we do, it does get tricky," says Pascucci. "If we have 500 Gig channels pre-provisioned with the ability to activate 100 Gig segments as needed, that gives us an advantage versus having to figure out how many line cards to have deployed in which nodes, and forecasting which nodes should have the line cards in the first place."
The operator is already seeing demand for 100 Gigabit services, from the carrier market and large content providers. The operator already provides 10x10Gbps and 20x10Gbps services to customers. "With that there are all the challenges of provisioning ten or 20 10 Gig circuits and 10 or 20 cross-connects for each site," says Pascucci. The operator also manages one and two Terabits of network capacity for certain customers.
"Having the ability to turn up large bandwidth is critical to our business, especially as the [traffic] numbers continue to grow," says Pascucci.
Analysts' comments
Gazettabye asked several industry analysts about the significance of Infinera's announcement. In particular the uniqueness of the offering, the claim to reduce rapidly bandwidth enablement times and its importance for operators.
Infonetics Research
Andrew Schmitt, directing analyst for optical
Schmitt believes Infinera's announcement is significant as it is the first announced North American win. It also shows the company has a solution for carriers that only want to roll out a single 100 Gbps but don't want to buy 500Gbps.
More importantly, it should allow some carriers to deploy extra capacity for future use at no cost to them and that opens up interesting possibilities for automatically switched optical network (ASON) management or even software-defined networking (SDN).
"As to the claim that it reduces capacity enablement from weeks to potential minutes, to some degree, yes," says Schmitt.
Certainly Ciena, Alcatel-Lucent or Cisco could ship extra line cards into customers and not charge the customer until they are used and that would effectively achieve the same result. "But if the PIC truly has better economics than the discrete solutions from these vendors then Infinera can ship hardware up front and then recognise the profits on the back end," he says.
"You simply can't predict where the best places to put bandwidth will be"
In turn, if customers get free inventory management out of the deal and Infinera equipment can support that arrangement more economically, that is a significant advantage for Infinera.
"This instant bandwidth is unique to Infinera. As I said, anyone could do this deal. But you need a hardware cost structure that can support it or it gets expensive quickly," says Schmitt. "Everyone is working on super-channels but it is clear from the legacy of the way the 10 Gig DTN hardware and software worked that Infinera gets it."
Schmitt believes the term super-channel is abused. He prefers the term virtualised bandwidth - optical capacity that can be allocated the same way server or storage resources are assigned through virtualization.
"The SDN hype is hitting strong in this business but Infinera is really one of the only companies that have a history of a hardware and software architecture that lends itself well to this concept," he says. This is validated with its customer list which is loaded heavily with service providers that are not just talking about SDN but actively doing something, he says.
"It [turning capacity up quickly] is important for SDN as well as more advanced protection arrangements. You simply can't predict where the best places to put bandwidth will be," says Schmitt. "If you can have spare capacity in the network that is lit on demand but not paid for if you don't need it, it is the cheapest approach for avoiding overbuilding a network for corner-case requirements.
"I think the accounting for this product will be interesting, it is likely that we will know in a year how successful this concept was just by a careful examination of the company's financials," he concludes.
ACG Research
Eve Griliches, vice president of optical networking
Infinera delivered this year the DTN-X with 500 Gig super-channels based on PIC technology. Now, a new 500 Gig line card has been added that can operate at 100 Gig and the remaining 400 Gig can be lit in 100 Gig increments using software. This allows customers to purchase 100 Gig at a time, and turn up subsequent bandwidth via software when they require it.
“No other vendor has a software-based solution, and no one else is delivering 500 Gig yet either,” says Griliches.
With this solution, ACG Research says in its research note, operators can start to develop a flexible infrastructure where bandwidth can grow and move around the network instantly. This is useful to address varying demands in bandwidth, triggered by incidents such as natural disasters or sporting events.
Rapid bandwidth enablement has always been important and takes way too long, so this development is key, says Griliches: “Also, it enables Infinera to enter markets which only need one 100 Gig wavelength for now, which they could not do before.”
“No other vendor has a software-based solution, and no one else is delivering 500 Gig yet either”
Looking forward, ACG Research expects this software and hardware-based instant bandwidth utility model will enable Infinera to widen its potential market base and increase its global market share in 2013 and 2014.
Ovum
Ron Kline, principal analyst, and Dana Cooperson, vice president, of the network infrastructure practice
Ovum also thinks Infinera's announcement is significant. It brings essentially the same value proposition Infinera had with 10 Gigabit to the 100 Gigabit market - low operational expenditure (opex) and quick time-to-market. ”Remember 10 Gig in 10 days?” says Kline.
It further fixes an issue for customers in that with the 10x10Gbps, they had to essentially pay for the full 100Gbps up front, and then they could be very efficient with turn-up and opex. Customers made an efficient opex for more capital expenditure (capex) up-front trade. "With instant bandwidth, they don't have to make the upfront capex-versus-opex tradeoff; they can be most efficient with both,” says Cooperson.
Any vendor can shorten capacity enablement times if they can convince the operator to pre-position bandwidth in the network that is ready to be turned on at a moment's notice.
Ron Kline
Kline says operators has different processes for turning up services and in many cases it is these processes and not the equipment directly that is the cause of the additional time for provisioning. “For example the operator may not use the DNA system or may have a very complex OSS/BSS used in the process,” says Kline.
Nevertheless, the capability to have really short provisioning is there, if an operator wants to take advantage. In the TeliaSonera case, Infinera is managing the network so the quick time to market will be there, says Kline.
Cooperson adds that there can be many factors that impede the capacity enablement process, based on Ovum's own research. “But it is clear from talking to Infinera's customers that its system design and approach is a big benefit to those carriers, often the competitive carriers, in competing in the market,” she says. “Multiple carriers told us that with the Infinera system, they were able to win business from competitors.”
Any vendor can shorten capacity enablement times if they can convince the operator to pre-position bandwidth in the network that is ready to be turned on at a moment's notice. However what is unique to Infinera is its system is deployed 500Gbps at a time and all the switching is done electrically by the OTN switch at each node. Others are working on super-channels but none are close to deploying, says Ovum.
“Multiple carriers told us that with the Infinera system, they were able to win business from competitors.”
Dana Cooperson
The ability to turn on bandwidth rapidly is becoming increasingly important. From a wholesale operator perspective it is very important and a key differentiator.
"It's particularly relevant to wholesale applications where large bandwidth chunks are required and the customer is another carrier," says Cooperson. "Whether you view a Google or a Facebook as a carrier or a very large enterprise, it would apply to them as well as a more traditional carrier."
High fives: 5 Terabit OTN switching and 500 Gig super-channels.
Infinera has announced a core network platform that combines Optical Transport Network (OTN) switching with dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) transport. "We are looking at a system that integrates two layers of the network," says Mike Capuano, vice president of corporate marketing at Infinera.
"This is 100Tbps of non-blocking switching, all functioning as one system. You just can't do that with merchant silicon."
Mike Capuano, Infinera
The DTN-X platform is based on Infinera's third-generation photonic integrated circuit (PIC) that supports five, 100Gbps coherent channels.
Each DTN-X platform can deliver 5 Terabits-per-second (Tbps) of non-blocking OTN switching using an Infinera-designed ASIC. Ten DTN-X platforms can be combined to scale the OTN switching and transport capacity to 50Tbps currently.
Infinera also plans to add Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) to turn the DTN-X into a hybrid OTN/ MPLS switch. With the next upgrades to the PIC and the switching, the ten DTN-X platforms will scale to 100Tbps optical transport and 100Tbps OTN and MPLS switching capacity.
The platform is being promoted by Infinera as a way for operators to tackle network traffic growth and support developments such as cloud computing where applications and content increasingly reside in the network. "What that means [for cloud-based services to work] is a network with huge capacity and very low latency," says Capuano.
Platform details
The 5x100Gbps PIC supports what Infinera calls a 500Gbps 'super-channel'. Each super-channel is a multi-carrier implementation comprising five, 100Gbps wavelengths. Combined with OTN, the 500Gbps super-channel can be filled with 1, 10, 40 and 100 Gigabit streams (SONET/SDH, Ethernet, video etc). Moreover, there is no spectral efficiency penalty: the super-channel uses 250GHz of fibre spectrum, provisioning five 50GHz-wide, 100Gbps wavelengths at a time.
"We have seen 40 and 100Gbps come on the market and they are definitely helping with fibre capacity issues," says Capuano. "But they are more expensive from a cost-per-bit perspective than 10Gbps." By introducing the 500Gbps PIC, Infinera says it is reducing the cost-per-bit performance of high speed optical transport.
DTN-X: shown are 5 line and tributary cards top and bottom with switching cards in the centre of the chassis. Source: Infinera
Integrating OTN switching within the platform results in the lowest cost solution and is more efficient when compared to multiplexed transponders (muxponder) configured manually, or an external OTN switch which must be optically connected to the transport platform.
The DTN-X also employs Generalised MPLS (GMPS) software. "GMPLS makes it easy to deploy networks and services with point-and-click provisioning," says Capuano.
Each DTX-N line card supports a 500Gbps PIC but the chassis backplane is specified at 1Tbps, ready for Infinera's next-generation 10x100Gbps PIC that will upgrade the DTN-X to a 10Tbps system. "We have already presented our test results for our 1Tbps PIC back in March," says Capuano. The fourth-generation PIC, estimated around 2014 (based on a company slide although Infinera has made no public comment), will support a 1Tbps super-channel.
Adding MPLS will add the transport capability of the protocol to the DTN-X. "You will have MPLS transport, OTN switching and DWDM all in one platform," says Capuano.
OTN switching is the priority of the tier-one operators to carry and process their SONET/SDH traffic; adding MPLS will enable extra traffic processing capabilities to the system, he says.
Infinera says that by eventually integrating MPLS switching into the optical transport network, operators will be able to bypass expensive router ports and simplify their network operation.
Performance
Infinera says that the DTX-N 5Tbps performance does not dip however the system is configured: whether solely as a switch (all line card slots filled with tributary modules), mixed DWDM/ switching (half DWDM/ half tributaries, for example) or solely as a DWDM platform. Depending on the cards in the DTN-X platform, the transport/ switching configuration can be varied but the 5Tbps I/O capacity is retained. Infinera says other switches on the market do lose I/O capacity as the interface mix is varied.
Overall, Infinera claims the platform requires half the power of competing solutions and takes up a third less space.
The DTN-X will be available in the first half of 2012.
Analysis
Gazettabyte asked several market research firms about the significance of the DTN-X announcement and the importance of combining OTN, DWDM and soon MPLS within one platform.
Ovum
Ron Kline, principal analyst, and Dana Cooperson, vice president, of the network infrastructure practice
"MPLS switching is setting up a very interesting competitive dynamic among vendors"
Dana Cooperson, Ovum
The DTN-X is a platform for the largest service providers and their largest sites, says Ovum.
It sees the DTN-X in the same light as other integrated OTN/ WDM platforms such as Huawei's OSN 8800, Nokia Siemens Networks' hiT 7100, Alcatel-Lucent's 1830 PSS and Tellabs' 7100 OTS.
"It fits the mold for Verizon's long-haul optical transport platform (LH OTP), especially once MPLS is added," says Kline. "NSN is also claiming it will add MPLS to the 7100. Once MPLS is added, then you have the big packet optical transport box that Verizon wants."
The DTN-X platform will boost the business case for 100 Gig in a similar way to how Infinera's current PIC has done at 10 Gig. "The others will be forced to lower price," says Kline.
Having GMPLS is important, especially if there is a need to do dynamic bandwidth allocation, however it is customer-dependent. "When you start digging, it's hard to find large-scale implementations of GMPLS," says Kline.
The Ovum analysts stress that the need for OTN in the core depends on the customer. Content service providers like Google couldn't care less about OTN. "It's really an issue for multi-service providers like BT and AT&T," says Cooperson,
There is a consensus about the need for MPLS in the core. "Different service providers are likely to take different approaches — some might prefer an integrated box and others might not, it depends on their business," she says. "I think MPLS switching is setting up a very interesting competitive dynamic among vendors that focus on IP/MPLS, those that focus on optical, and those that are trying to do both [optical and IP/MPLS].
Ovum highlights several aspects regarding the DTN-X's claimed performance.
"Assuming it performs as advertised, this should finally give Infinera what it needs to be of real interest to the tier-ones," says Cooperson. "The message of scalability, simplicity, efficiency, and profitability is just what service providers want to hear."
Cooperson also highlights Infinera's approach to optical-electrical-optical conversion and the benefit this could deliver at line speeds greater than 100Gbps.
At present ROADMs are being upgraded to support flexible spectrum channel configurations, also known as gridless. This is to enable future line speeds that will use more spectrum than current 50GHz DWDM channels. Operators want ROADMs that support flexible spectrum requirements but managing the network to support these variable width channels is still to resolved.
"It fits the mold for Verizon's long-haul optical transport platform (LH OTP), especially once MPLS is added"
Ron Kline, Ovum
Infinera's approach is based on conversion to the electrical domain when dropping and regenerating wavelengths such that the issue of flexible channels does not arise or is at least forestalled. This, says Cooperson, could be Infinera's biggest point of differentiation.
"What impresses me is the 500Gbps super-channel using five, 100Gbps carriers and the size of the switch fabric," adds Kline. The 5Tbps switching performance also exceeds that of everyone else: "Alcatel-Lucent is closest with 4Tbps but most range from 1-3Tbps and top out at 3Tbps."
The ease of use is also a big deal. Infinera did very well in marketing rapid turn up: 10 Gig in 10 days for example, says Kline: "It looks like they will be able to do the same here with 100 Gig."
Infonetics Research
Andrew Schmitt, directing analyst, optical
"GMPLS isn't that important, yet."
The DTN-X is a WDM platform which optionally includes a switch fabric for carriers that want it integrated with the transport equipment, says Schmitt. Once MPLS is added, it has the potential to be a full-blown packet-optical system.
"[The announcement is] pretty significant though not unexpected," says Schmitt. "I think the key question is what it costs, and whether the 500G PIC translates into compelling savings."
Having MPLS support is important for some carriers such as XO Communications and Google but not for others.
Schmitt also says GMPLS isn't that important, yet. "Infinera's implementation of regen-rich networks should make their GMPLS implementation workable," he says. "It has been building networks like that for a while."
OTN in the core is still an open debate but any carrier that doesn't have the luxury of a homogenous data network needs it, he says
Schmitt has yet to speak with carriers who have used the DTN-X: "I can't comment on claimed performance but like I said, cost is important."
ACG Research
Eve Griliches, managing partner
"Infinera has already introduced the 500G PIC, but the OTN is significant in that it can be used as a standalone OTN switch, and it has the largest capacity out there today"
The DTN-X as an OTN/ WDM platform awaiting label switch router (LSR) functionality, says Griliches: "With the LSR functionality it will be able to do statistical multiplexing for direct router connections."
Infinera has already introduced the 500 Gig PIC but the OTN is significant in that it can be used as a standalone OTN switch, and it has the largest capacity out there today. An OTN survey conducted last year by ACG Research found that the switch capacity sweet spot is between 4 and 8Tbps.
Griliches says that LSR-based products are taking time to incorporate WDM and OTN technologies, while it is unclear when the DTN-X will support MPLS to add LSR capabilities. The race is on as to whom can integrate everything first, but DWDM and OTN before MPLS is the right direction for most tier-one operators, she says.
Infinera has over eight thousand of its existing DTNs deployed at 85 customers in 50 countries. The scale of the DTN-X will likely broaden Infinera's customer base to include tier-one operators, says Griliches.
ACG Research has heard positive feedback from operators it has spoken to. One stressed that the decreased port count due to the larger OTN cross-connect significantly improves efficiencies. Another operator said it would pick Infinera and said the beta version of the 500Gbps PIC is "working beautifully".