Verizon on 100G+ optical transmission developments

Source: Gazettabyte

Feature: 100 Gig and Beyond. Part 1:

Verizon's Glenn Wellbrock discusses 100 Gig deployments and higher speed optical channel developments for long haul and metro. 

The number of 100 Gigabit wavelengths deployed in the network has continued to grow in 2013.

According to Ovum, 100 Gigabit has become the wavelength of choice for large wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) systems, with spending on 100 Gigabit now exceeding 40 Gigabit spending. LightCounting forecasts that 40,000, 100 Gigabit line cards will be shipped this year, 25,000 in the second half of the year alone. Infonetics Research, meanwhile, points out that while 10 Gigabit will remain the highest-volume speed, the most dramatic growth is at 100 Gigabit. By 2016, the majority of spending in long-haul networks will be on 100 Gigabit, it says.

The market research firms' findings align with Verizon's own experience deploying 100 Gigabit. The US operator said in September that it had added 4,800, 100 Gigabit miles of its global IP network during the first half of 2013, to total 21,400 miles in the US network and 5,100 miles in Europe. Verizon expects to deploy another 8,700 miles of 100 Gigabit in the US and 1,400 miles more in Europe by year end.

"We expect to hit the targets; we are getting close," says Glenn Wellbrock, director of optical transport network architecture and design at Verizon.

Verizon says several factors are driving the need for greater network capacity, including its FiOS bundled home communication services, Long Term Evolution (LTE) wireless and video traffic. But what triggered Verizon to upgrade its core network to 100 Gig was converging its IP networks and the resulting growth in traffic. "We didn't do a lot of 40 Gig [deployments] in our core MPLS [Multiprotocol Label Switching] network," says Wellbrock.

The cost of 100 Gigabit was another factor: A 100 Gigabit long-haul channel is now cheaper than ten, 10 Gig channels.  There are also operational benefits using 100 Gig such as having fewer wavelengths to manage. "So it is the lower cost-per-bit plus you get all the advantages of having the higher trunk rates," says Wellbrock.          

Verizon expects to continue deploying 100 Gigabit. First, it has a large network and much of the deployment will occur in 2014. "Eventually, we hope to get a bit ahead of the curve and have some [capacity] headroom," says Wellbrock. 

We could take advantage of 200 Gig or 400 Gig or 500 Gig today

Super-channel trials

Operators, working with optical vendors, are trialling super-channels and advanced modulation schemes such as 16-QAM (quadrature amplitude amplitude). Such trials involve links carrying data in multiples of 100 Gig: 200 Gig, 400 Gig, even a Terabit.

Super-channels are already carrying live traffic. Infinera's DTN-X system delivers 500 Gig super-channels using quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) modulation. Orange has a 400 Gigabit super-channel link between Lyon and Paris. The 400 Gig super-channel comprises two carriers, each carrying 200 Gig using 16-QAM, implemented using Alcatel-Lucent's 1830 photonic service switch platform and its photonic service engine (PSE) DSP-ASIC.

"We could take advantage of 200 Gig or 400 Gig or 500 Gig today," says Wellbrock. "As soon as it is cost effective, you can use it because you can put multiple 100 Gig channels on there and multiplex them."

The issue with 16-QAM, however, is its limited reach using existing fibre and line systems - 500-700km - compared to QPSK's 2,500+ km before regeneration. "It [16-QAM] will only work in a handful of applications - 25 percent, something of this nature," says Wellbrock. This is good for a New York to Boston, he says, but not New York to Chicago. "From our end it is pretty simple, it is lowest cost," says Wellbrock. "If we can reduce the cost, we will use it [16-QAM]. However, if the reach requirement cannot be met, the operator will not go to the expense of putting in signal regenerators to use 16-QAM do, he says.

Earlier this year Verizon conducted a trial with Ciena using 16-QAM. The goals were to test 16-QAM alongside live traffic and determine whether the same line card would work at 100 Gig using QPSK and 200 Gig using 16-QAM. "The good thing is you can use the same hardware; it is a firmware setting," says Wellbrock.

We feel that 2015 is when we can justify a new, greenfield network and that 100 Gig or versions of that - 200 Gig or 400 Gig - will be cheap enough to make sense 

100 Gig in the metro

Verizon says there is already sufficient traffic pressure in its metro networks to justify 100 Gig deployments. Some of Verizon's bigger metro locations comprise up to 200 reconfigurable optical add/ drop multiplexer (ROADM) nodes. Each node is typically a central office connected to the network via a ROADM, varying from a two-degree to an eight-degree design.

"Not all the 200 nodes would need multiple 100 Gig channels but in the core of the network, there is a significant amount of capacity that needs to be moved around," says Wellbrock. "100 Gig will be used as soon as it is cost-effective." 

Unlike long-haul, 100 Gigabit in the metro remains costlier than ten 10 Gig channels. That said, Verizon has deployed metro 100 Gig when absolutely necessary, for example connecting two router locations that need to be connected using 100 Gig. Here Verizon is willing to pay extra for such  links.

"By 2015 we are really hoping that the [metro] crossover point will be reached, that 100 Gig will be more cost effective in the metro than ten times 10 [Gig]." Verizon will build a new generation of metro networks based on 100 Gig or 200 Gig or 400 Gig using coherent receivers rather than use existing networks based on conventional 10 Gig links to which 100 Gig is added.

"We feel that 2015 is when we can justify a new, greenfield network and that 100 Gig or versions of that - 200 Gig or 400 Gig - will be cheap enough to make sense."   

Data Centres

The build-out of data centres is not a significant factor driving 100 Gig demand. The largest content service providers do use tens of 100 Gigabit wavelengths to link their mega data centres but they typically have their own networks that connect relatively few sites.

"If you have lots of data centres, the traffic itself is more distributed, as are the bandwidth requirements," says Wellbrock.

Verizon has over 220 data centres, most being hosting centres. The data demand between many of the sites is relatively small and is served with 10 Gigabit links. "We are seeing the same thing with most of our customers," says Wellbrock.

Technologies

System vendors continue to develop cheaper line cards to meet the cost-conscious metro requirements. Module developments include smaller 100 Gig 4x5-inch MSA transponders, 100 Gig CFP modules and component developments for line side interfaces that fit within CFP2 and CFP4 modules.

"They are all good," says Wellbrock when asked which of these 100 Gigabit metro technologies are important for the operator. "We would like to get there as soon as possible." 

The CFP4 may be available by late 2015 but more likely in 2016, and will reduce significantly the cost of 100 Gig. "We are assuming they are going to be there and basing our timelines on that," he says.

Greater line card port density is another benefit once 100 Gig CFP2 and CFP4 line side modules become available. "Lower power and greater density which is allowing us to get more bandwidth on and off the card." sats Wellbrock.

Existing switch and routers are bandwidth-constrained: they have more traffic capability that the faceplate can provide. "The CFPs, the way they are today, you can only get four on a card, and a lot of the cards will support twice that much capacity," says Wellbrock.

With the smaller form factor CFP2 and CFP4, 1.2 and 1.6 Terabits card will become possible from 2015. Another possible development is a 400 Gigabit CFP which would achieve a similar overall capacity gains. 

Coherent, not just greater capacity

Verizon is looking for greater system integration and continues to encourage industry commonality in optical component building blocks to drive down cost and promote scale.

Indeed Verizon believes that industry developments such as MSAs and standards are working well. Wellbrock prefers standardisation to custom designs like 100 Gigabit direct detection modules or company-specific optical module designs. 

Wellbrock stresses the importance of coherent receiver technology not only in enabling higher capacity links but also a dynamic optical layer. The coherent receiver adds value when it comes to colourless, directionless, contentionless (CDC) and flexible grid ROADMs.

"If you are going to have a very cost-effective 100 Gigabit because the ecosystem is working towards similar solutions, then you can say: 'Why don't I add in this agile photonic layer?' and then I can really start to do some next-generation networking things."  This is only possible, says Wellbrock, because of the tunabie filter offered by a coherent receiver, unlike direct detection technology with its fixed-filter design.

"Today, if you want to move from one channel to the next - wavelength 1 to wavelength 2 - you have to physically move the patch cord to another filter," says Wellbrock. "Now, the [coherent] receiver can simply tune the local oscillator to channel 2; the transmitter is full-band tunable, and now the receiver is full-band tunable as well." This tunability can be enabled remotely rather than requiring an on-site engineer. 

Such wavelength agility promises greater network optimisation.

"How do we perhaps change some of our sparing policy? How do we change some of our restoration policies so that we can take advantage of that agile photonics later," says Wellbroack. "That is something that is only becoming available because of the coherent 100 Gigabit receivers."    

Part 2, click here

Comments

[Edward]

Regarding "Unlike long-haul, 100 Gigabit in the metro remains costlier than ten 10 Gig channels", I would like to understand what exactly makes it more costlier?

[Roy Rubenstein]

Edward, Here is Verizon's response to your question:

"Today, 100G in the metro costs the same as 100G in long haul, but the equipment costs for 10G are much cheaper in metro than they are for long haul. Consequently, the relative cost is higher, making 100G attractive in long haul applications (less than 10 x 10G), but cost prohibitive in metro (more than 10 x 10G)."