Lumentum on ROADM growth, ZR+, and 800G
CTO interview: Brandon Collings
- The ROADM market is experiencing a period of sustained growth
- The Open ROADM MSA continues to advance and expand its scope
- ZR+ coherent modules will support some interoperability to avoid becoming siloed but optical performance differentiation remains key
Lumentum reckons the ROADM growth started some 18-24 months ago.
Brandon Collings gave a Market Focus talk at the recent ECOC show in Dublin, where he explained why it is a good time to be in the reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexer (ROADM) business.
“Quantities are growing substantially and it is not one reason but a multitude of reasons,” says Collings. The CTO of Lumentum reckons the growth started some 18-24 months ago.
ROADM markets
Lumentum highlights three factors fuelling the demand for ROADM components.
The first is the emergence of markets such as China and India that previously did not use ROADMs.
“China has pretty universally adopted ROADMs going forward,” says Collings. Previously, Optical Transport Network (OTN) point-to-point links and large OTN switches have been used. But ongoing traffic growth means this solution alone is not sustainable, both in terms of the switch capacity and the number of optical transceivers required.
“The bandwidth needed for these OTN switches is scaling beyond the rational use of optical-electrical-optical (OEO) node configuration,” says Collings. “You need 50 to 300 terabits of OTN [switch capacity] surrounded by the equivalent amount of optical transceivers, and that is not economical.”
The Chinese service providers have adopted a hybrid ROADM and OTN network architecture. The ROADMs perform optical bypass – passing on lightpaths destined for other nodes in the network – to reduce the optical transceivers and OTN switch capacity needed.
The network operators in India, in contrast, are using ROADMs to cope with the many fibre cuts they experience. The ROADMs are used to restore the network by rerouting traffic around the faults.
A second market magnifier is how modern ROADM networks use more wavelength-selective switches (WSSes). Both colourless and directionless (CD) ROADMs, and colourless, directionless and contentionless (CDC) ROADMs use more WSSes per node (see diagram above).
Such ROADMs also use more advanced WSS designs. Using an MxN WSS for the multicast switch in a route-and-select CDC ROADM, for example, delivers system benefits especially when adding and dropping wider optical channels that are starting to be used. Collings says Lumentum’s own MxN WSS is now close to volume manufacturing.
The third factor fuelling ROADM growth is the ongoing demand for more capacity. “Every time you fill a fibre, you typically use another degree in your [ROADM] node and light up a second fibre to grow capacity,” says Collings.
Operators with limited fibre are exploiting the fibre’s spectrum by using the C-band and L-band to grow capacity. This, too, requires more WSSes per node.
“All of these growth factors are happening simultaneously,” says Collings.
Open ROADM MSA
Lumentum is also a member of the Open ROADM multi-source agreement (MSA) that has created a disaggregated design to enable interoperability between systems vendors’ ROADMs.
AT&T is deploying Open ROADM systems in its metro networks while the MSA members have begun work on Revision 6.0 of the standard.
“Open ROADM is maturing and increasing its span of interest,” says Collings.
At first glance, Lumentum’s membership is surprising given it supplies ROADM building-blocks to vendors that make the ROADM systems. Moreover, the Open ROADM standard views a ROADM as an enclosed system.
“The Open ROADM has set certain boundaries where it defines interfaces so that vendor A can talk to vendor B,” says Collings. “And it has set that boundary pretty much at the complete ROADM node.”
Yet Lumentum is an MSA member because part of the software involved in controlling the ROADM is within the node. “It is not just a hardware solution, it is hardware and a significant software solution to supply into that,” says Collings.
Pluggable optics is also a part of the Open ROADM MSA, another reason for Lumentum’s interest. “There is a general discussion about potentially making a boundary condition around pluggable optics as well,” he says.
Collings says the MSA continues to build the ecosystem and the management system to help others use Open ROADM, not just AT&T.
400ZR, OpenZR+ and ZR+
As a supplier of coherent optics and line-side modules, Lumentum is interested in the OIF’s 400ZR standard and what is referred to as ZR+.
ZR+ offers an extended set of features and enhance optical performance. Both 400ZR and ZR+ will be implemented using QSFP-DD and OSFP pluggable modules.
The 400ZR specification has been developed for a specific purpose: to deliver 400 Gigabit Ethernet for distances of at least 80km for data centre interconnect applications. But 400ZR is not suited for more demanding metro mesh and longer-distance metro-regional applications.
This is what ZR+ aims to address. However, ZR+, unlike 400ZR, is not a standard and is a broad term.
At ECOC, Acacia Communications and NTT Electronics detailed interoperability between their coherent DSPs using what they call ‘OpenZR+’. OpenZR+ uses Ethernet traffic like 400ZR but also supports the additional data rates of 100, 200 and 300 Gigabit Ethernet. OpenZR+ also borrows from the OpenROADM specification to enable module interoperability between vendors for data centre interconnect applications with reaches beyond 120km.
But ZR+ encompasses differentiated coherent designs that support 400 gigabits in a compact pluggable but also lower transmission rates that trade capacity for reach.
“So, yes, both classes of ‘ZR+’ are emerging,” says Collings.
OpenZR+ seeks interoperability in compact pluggables, as well as higher power, higher performance modes less focused on interoperability, while ZR+ includes proprietary, higher-power solutions. “That [ZR+] is an area where distance and capacity equal money, in terms of savings and value,” says Collings. “That is going to be an area of differentiation, as it has always been for coherent interfaces.”
Collings favours some standardisation around ZR+, to enable interchangeability among module vendors and avoid the creation of a siloed market.
“But I don’t think we are going to find ZR+ interfaces defined for interoperability because you will find yourself walking back on that differentiation in terms of value that the network operators are looking to extract,” says Collings. “They need every bit of distance they can get.”
Network operators want compact, cost-effective solutions that do ‘even more stuff’ than they are used to. “400ZR checks that box but for bigger, broader networks, operators want the same thing,” says Collings.
There is a continuum of possibilities here, he says: “It is high value from a network operator point of view and it’s a technology challenge for the likes of us and the [DSP] chip vendors.”
800G Pluggable MSA
Lumentum also recently joined the 800G Pluggable MSA that was announced at the CIOE show, held in Shenzhen in September.
“Like any client interface where Lumentum is a supplier of the underlying [laser] chips – whether DMLs, EMLs or VCSELs – we feel it is pretty important for us to be in the definition setting of the interface,” says Collings. “We want the interface to be aligned optimally to what the chip can do.”
Lumentum announced last year that it is exiting the client-side module business and therefore will be less involved in the module aspects of the interface work.
“Having moved out of the [client-side] module business, we’re finding an awful lot of customers interested in engaging with us on the chip level, much more than before,” says Collings.
Further information
For an Optical Connections article about OpenZR+, co-authored by Acacia, NTT Electronics, Lumentum, Juniper Networks and Fujitsu Optical Components, click here
Open ROADM gets deployed as work starts on Release 6.0
AT&T has deployed Open ROADM technology in its network and says all future reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexer (ROADM) deployments will be based on the standard.
“At this point, it is in a single metro and we are working on a second large metro area,” says John Paggi, assistant vice president member of technical staff, network infrastructure and services at AT&T.
Open ROADM listed as a requirement in RFPs (Request For Proposals) from many other service providers
As shown are the various elements included in the disaggregated Open ROADM MSA. Also shown is the hierarchical SDN controller architecture with the federated controllers overseeing the optical layer and the multi-layer controller overseeing the path creation across the layer, from IP to optical. Source: Open ROADM MSA
Meanwhile, the Open ROADM multi-source agreement (MSA) continues to progress, with members working on Release 6.0 of the standard.
Motivation
AT&T is a founding member of the Open ROADM MSA along with system vendors Ciena, Fujitsu and Nokia. The organisation has since grown to 23 members, 13 of which operate networks. Besides AT&T, the communications service providers include Deutsche Telekom, Orange, KDDI, SK Telecom and Telecom Italia.
The initiative was created to promote a disaggregated ROADM standard that enables interoperability between vendors’ ROADMs.
The specification work includes the development of open interfaces to control the ROADMs using software-defined networking (SDN) technology. The scope of the disaggregated design has also been expanded beyond ROADMs to include optical transceivers, OTN switching to handle sub-wavelength traffic, and optical amplifiers.
AT&T viewed the MSA as a way to change the traditional model of assigning two ROADM system vendors for each of its metro regions.
“We had two suppliers to keep each other honest,” says Paggi. “But once we had committed a region to a supplier, we were more or less beholden to that supplier for additional ROADM and transponder purchases.”
AT&T wanted ‘true hyper-competition’ among ROADM and transponder suppliers and the Open ROADM MSA was the result.
The operator saw the MSA as a way to reduce costs and speed up innovation by using an open networking model. Opening up and standardising the design would also allow innovative start-up vendors to participate. With the traditional supply model, an operator would favour larger firms knowing it would be dependent on the suppliers for 5-10 years.
“Because you can mix and match different suppliers, Open ROADM allows us to introduce disrupters to our environment,” says Paggi.
Evolution
The first Open ROADM revision used 100-gigabit wavelengths and a 50GHz fixed grid. A flexible grid and in-line amplification that extended the reach of 100-gigabit wavelengths to 1,000km were then added with Revision 2.
“In Revision 3 we made Open ROADM applicable to more use cases,” says Martin Birk, director member of technical staff, network infrastructure and services, AT&T. “We started introducing things like OTUCn and FlexO in preparation for 400 gigabits.” The OTN ‘Beyond 100 gigabit’ OTUCn format comprises ‘n’ multiples of 100-gigabit OTUC frames, while FlexO refers to the Flexible OTN format.
Adopting OTN technologies is part of enabling Open ROADM to support 200-, 300- and 400-gigabit wavelengths.
Revision 4 then added ODUFlex, 400-gigabit clients, and support for low-noise amplifiers to further extend reach, while the latest fifth revision adds streaming telemetry for network monitoring using work from the OpenConfig industry group.
“A lot of features that widen considerably the application of Open ROADM,” says Birk.
Revision 6.0
The frequency of each Open ROADM release was initially once a year but now the scope of each revision has been curtailed to enable two releases a year. Members are polled as to what new features are required at the start of each standardisation process.
Now, the MSA members are working on revision 6.0 that covers ‘all directions’ of the standard.
“We are improving the control plane interoperability with more features,” says Birk. “Right now you have a single network view; in future, you could have an idealised network plan and a network view with actual failures, and you could provision services across these network views.”
And with the advent of 600-gigabit, 800-gigabit and even 1.2-terabit coherent wavelengths, OpenROADM members may add support for faster speeds than 400 gigabits.
“Just as our suppliers continue to evolve their roadmaps, so does the Open ROADM MSA to stay relevant,” says Birk.
AT&T’s Open ROADM deployments support 100-gigabit wavelengths while the 400-gigabit technology is still in development.
“The ROADMs will not change; the only thing that will change is the software,” says Birk. “And in a disaggregated design, you can leave the ROADMs on version 2.0 and upgrade the transponders to 400 gigabits and version 5.0.”
This, says Birk, is why it is much easier to introduce new technology with an open design compared to monolithic platforms where an upgrade involves all the element management systems, ROADMs and transponders.
Status
The Open ROADM MSA says it is up to individual network operator members to declare the status of their Open ROADM network deployments. Accordingly, the status of overall Open ROADM deployments is unclear.
What AT&T will say is that it is being approached by vendors that want to demonstrate their Open ROADM technology to the operator.
“When we ask them why they have done this without any agreement that AT&T would purchase their solutions, they respond that they are seeing Open ROADM listed as a requirement in RFPs (Request For Proposals) from many other service providers,” says Paggi. “They have taken it upon themselves to develop Open ROADM-compliant products.”
At the OFC show earlier this year, an Open ROADM MSA showcased an SDN controller turning up a wavelength to send virtual machines between two data centres. The SDN controller then terminated the optical connection on completion of the transfer.
Operators AT&T and Orange were part of the demonstration as was the University of Texas, Dallas. “They [the University of Texas] are a supercomputing centre and they can create some nice applications on top of Open ROADM,” says Birk.
The system vendors involved in the OFC demonstration included Ciena, Fujitsu, ECI Telecom, Infinera and Juniper Networks.
Juniper Networks opens up the optical line system
Juniper Networks has responded to the demands of the large-scale data centre players with an open optical line system architecture.
Donyel Jones-WilliamsThe system vendor has created software external to its switch, IP router and optical transport platforms that centrally controls the optical layer.
Juniper has also announced a reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexer (ROADM) - the TCX1000 - that is Lumentum’s own white box ROADM design. Juniper will offer the Lumentum white box as its own, part of its optical product portfolio.
The open line system architecture, including the TCX1000, is also being pitched to communications service providers that want an optical line system and prefer to deal with a single vendor.
“Juniper plans to address the optical layer with a combination of software and open hardware in the common optical layer,” says Andrew Schmitt, founder and lead analyst at Cignal AI. “This is the solution it will bring to customers rather than partnering with an optical vendor, which Juniper has tried several times without great success.”
Open line systems
An optical line system comprises terminal and transmission equipment and network management software. The terminal equipment refers to coherent optics hosted on platforms, while line elements such as filters, optical amplifiers and ROADMs make up the transmission equipment. Traditionally, a single vendor has provided all these elements with the network management software embedded within the vendor’s platforms.
An open optical line system refers to line equipment and the network management system from a vendor such as Nokia, Infinera or Ciena that allows the attachment of independent terminal equipment. An example would be the Telecom Infra Project’s Voyager box linked to a Nokia line system, says Schmitt.
The open line system can also be implemented as a disaggregated design. Here, says Schmitt, the control software would be acquired from a vendor such as Juniper, Fujitsu, or Ciena with the customer buying open ROADMs, amplifiers and filters from various vendors before connecting them. Open software interfaces are used to communicate with these components. And true to an open line system, any terminal equipment can be connected.
The advantage of an open disaggregated optical line system is that elements can be bought from various sources to avoid vendor lock-in. It also allows the best components to be acquired and upgraded as needed.
Meanwhile, disaggregating the management and control software from the optical line system and equipment appeals to the way the internet content providers architect and manage their large-scale data centres. This is what Juniper’s proNX Optical Director platform enables, the second part of its open line system announcement.
Juniper believes its design is an industry first in how it separates the control plane from the optical hardware.
“We have taken the concept of disaggregation and software-defined networking to separate the control plane out of the hardware,” says Donyel Jones-Williams, director of product marketing management at Juniper Networks. “Our control plane is no longer tied to physical hardware.”
Having an open line system supplied by one vendor gets you 90% of the way there
Disaggregated control benefits the optimisation of the open line system, and enables flexible updates without disrupting the service.
Cignal AI’s Schmitt says that the cloud and co-location players are already using open line systems just not disaggregated ones.
“Having an open line system supplied by one vendor gets you 90% of the way there,” says Schmitt. For him, a key question is what problem is being solved by taking this one step further and disaggregating the hardware.
Schmitt’s view is that an operator introduces a lot of complexity into the network for the marginal benefit of picking hardware suppliers independently. “And realistically they are still single-sourcing the software from a vendor like Juniper or Ciena,” says Schmitt.
Juniper now can offer an open line system, and if a customer wants a disaggregated one, it can build it. “I don’t think users will choose to do that,” says Schmitt. “But Juniper is in a great position to sell the right open line system technology to its customer base and this announcement is interesting and important because Juniper is clearly stating this is the path it plans to take.”
TCX1000 and proNX
Juniper’s open optical line system announcement is the latest development in its optical strategy since it acquired optical transport firm, BTI Systems, in 2016.
BTI’s acquisition provided Juniper with a line system for 100-gigabit transport. “The filters and ROADMs didn’t allow the system to scale to 200-gigabit and 400-gigabit line rates and to support super-channels and flexgrid,” says Jones-Williams.
With the TCX1000, Juniper now has a one-rack-unit 20-degree ROADM that is colourless, directionless and which supports flexgrid to enable 400-gigabit, 600-gigabit and even higher capacity optical channels in future. The TCX1000 supports up to 25.6 terabits-per-second per line.
A customer can also buy the white box ROADM from Lumentum directly, says Juniper. “It gives our customers freedom as to how they want to source their product,” says Jones-Williams.
Competition between vendors is now in the software domain. We no longer believe that there is differentiation in the optical line system hardware
Juniper’s management and control software, the ProNX Optical Director, has been architected using microservices. Microservices offers a way to architect applications using virtualisation technology. Each application is run in isolation based on the service they provide. This allows a service to run and scale independently while application programming interfaces (APIs) enable communication with other services.
Container technology is used to implement microservices. Containers use fewer hardware resources than virtual machines, an alternative approach to server virtualisation.
Source: Juniper Networks.
“It is built for data centre operators,” says Don Frey, principal analyst, routers and transport at the market research firm, Ovum. “Microservices makes the product more modular.”
Juniper believes the competition between vendors is now in the software domain. “We no longer believe that there is differentiation in the optical line system hardware,” says Jones-Williams.
Data centre operators are not concerned about line system interoperability, they are just trying to remove the blade lock-in so they can get the latest technology.
Market demands
Most links between data centres are point-to-point networks yet despite that, the internet content providers are interested in ROADMs, says Juniper. What they want is to simplify network design using the ROADM’s colourless and flexible grid attributes. A directionless ROADM is only needed for complex hub sites that require flexibility in moving wavelengths through a mesh network.
The strategy of the large-scale data centre operators is to split the optical system between an open line system and purpose-built blades. The split allows them to upgrade to the best blades or pluggable optics while leaving the core untouched. “The concept is similar to the open submarine cables as the speed of innovation in core systems is not the same as the line optics,” says Frey. “Data centre operators are not concerned about line system interoperability, they are just trying to remove the blade lock-in so they can get the latest technology.”
Juniper says there is also interest from communications service providers in the ROADM as part of their embrace of open initiatives such as the Open ROADM MSA. Frey says AT&T will make its first deployment of the Open ROADM before the year-end or in early 2018.
“There are a lot of synergies in terms of what we have announced and things like Open ROADM,” says Jones-Williams. “But we know that there are customers out there that just want a line system and they do not care if it is open or not.”
Juniper is already working with customers with its open line system as part of the development of its proNX software.
The branded ROADM and the proNX Optical Director will be generally available in early 2018.
