Glenn Wellbrock’s engineering roots
After four decades shaping optical networking, Glenn Wellbrock has retired. He shares his career highlights, industry insights, and his plans to embrace a quieter life of farming and hands-on projects in rural Kansas.
Glenn Wellbrock’s (pictured) fascination with telecommunications began at an early age. “I didn’t understand how it worked, and I wanted to know,” he recalls.
Wellbrock’s uncle had a small, rural telephone company where he worked while studying, setting the stage for his first full-time job at telecom operator, MCI. Wellbrock entered a world of microwave and satellite systems; MCI was originally named Microwave Communications Incorporated. “They were all ex-military guys, and I’m the rookie coming out of school trying to do my best and learn,” says Wellbrock.
The challenge that dominated the first decade of this century.
The arrival of fibre optics in the late 1980s marked a pivotal shift. As colleagues hesitated to embrace the new “glass” technology, Wellbrock seized the opportunity. “I became the fibre guy,” he says. “My boss said, ‘Anything breaks over there, it’s your problem. You go fix it.’”
This hands-on role propelled him into the early days of optical networking, where he worked on asynchronous systems with bit rates ranging from hundreds of kilobits to over a megabit, before SONET/SDH standards took over.
By the 1990s, with a young family, Wellbrock moved to Texas, contributing to MCI’s development of OC-48 (2.5 gigabit-per-second or Gbps) systems, a precursor to the high-capacity networks that would define his career.
Hitting a speed wall
One of Wellbrock’s proudest achievements was overcoming the barrier to get to speeds faster than 10Gbps, a challenge that dominated the first decade of this century.
Polarisation mode dispersion (PMD) in an optical fibre was a significant hurdle, limiting the distance and reliability of high-speed links. By then, he was working at a start-up and did not doubt that using phase modulation was the answer.
Wellbrock recalls conversations he had with venture capitalists at the time: “I said: ‘Okay, I get we are a company of 40 guys and I don’t even know if they can build it, but somebody’s going to do it, and they’re going to own this place.’”
Wellbrock admits he didn’t know the answer would be coherent optics, but he knew intensity modulation direct detection had reached its limits.
For a short period, Wellbrock was part of Marconi before joining Verizon in 2006. In 2007, he was involved in a Verizon field trial between Miami and Tampa, 300 miles apart, which demonstrated a 100Gbps direct-detection system. “It was so manual,” he admits. “It took three of us working through the night to keep it working so we could show it to the executives in the morning.”
While the trial passed video, it was clear that direct detection wouldn’t scale. The solution lay in coherent detection, which Wellbrock’s team, working with Nortel (acquired by Ciena), finally brought to market by 2009.
“Coherent was like seeing a door,” he says. “PMD was killing you, but you open the door, and it’s a vast room. We had breathing room for almost two decades.”
Verizon’s lab in Texas had multiple strands of production fibre that looped back to the lab every 80km. “We could use real-world glass with all the impairments, but keep equipment in one location,” says Wellbrock.
This setup enabled rigorous testing and led to numerous post-deadline papers at OFC, cementing Verizon’s reputation for optical networking innovation.
Rise of the hyperscalers
Wellbrock’s career spanned a transformative era in telecom, from telco-driven innovation to the rise of hyperscalers like Google and Microsoft.
He acknowledges the hyperscalers’ influence as inevitable due to their scale. “If you buy a million devices, you’re going to get attention,” he says. “We’re buying 100 of the same thing.”
Hyperscalers’ massive orders for pluggable modules and tunable lasers—technologies telcos like Verizon helped pioneer—have driven costs down, benefiting the industry.
However, Wellbrock notes that telcos remain vital for universal connectivity. “Every person, every device is connected,” he says. “Telcos aren’t going anywhere.”
Reliability remains a core challenge, particularly as networks grow. Wellbrock emphasises dual homing—redundant network paths—as telecom’s time-tested solution. “You can’t have zero failures,” he says. “Everything’s got a failure rate associated with it.”
He sees hyperscalers grappling with similar issues, as evidenced by a Google keynote at the Executive Forum at OFC 2025, which sought solutions for network failures linking thousands of AI accelerators in a data centre.
Wellbrock’s approach to such challenges is rooted in collaboration. “You’ve got to work with the ecosystem,” he insists. “Nobody solves every problem alone.”
Hollow-core fibre
Looking forward, what excites Wellbrock is hollow-core fibre, which he believes could be as transformative as SONET, optical amplifiers, and coherent detection.
Unlike traditional fibre, hollow-core fibre uses air-filled waveguides, offering near-zero loss, low latency, and vast bandwidth potential. “If we could get hollow-core fibre with near-zero loss and as much bandwidth as you needed, it would give us another ride at 20 years’ worth of growth,” he says. “It’s like opening another door.”
While companies like Microsoft are experimenting with hollow-core fibre, Wellbrock cautions that widespread adoption is years away. “They’re probably putting in [a high fibre glass] 864 [strand]-count standard glass and a few hollow core [strands],” he notes.
For long-haul routes, the technology promises lower latency and freedom from nonlinear effects, but challenges remain in developing compatible transmitters, receivers, and amplifiers. “All we’ve got to do is build those,” he says, laughing, acknowledging the complexity.
Wellbrock also highlights fibre sensing as a practical innovation, enabling real-time detection of cable damage. “If we can detect an excavator getting closer, we can stop it before it breaks a fibre link,” he explains. This technology, developed in collaboration with partners like NEC and Ciena, integrates optical time-domain reflectometry (OTDR) into transmission systems, thereby enhancing network reliability.
Learnings
Wellbrock’s approach to innovation centres on clearly defining problems to engage the broader ecosystem. “Defining the problem is two-thirds of solving it,” he says, crediting a Verizon colleague, Tiejun J. Xia, for the insight. “If you articulate it well, lots of smart people can help you fix it.”
This philosophy drove his success at OFC, where he used the conference to share challenges, such as fibre sensing, and rally vendor support. “You’ve got to explain the value of solving it,” he adds. “Then you’ll get 10 companies and 1,000 engineers working on it.”
He advises against preconceived solutions or excluding potential partners. “Never say never,” he says. “Be open to ideas and work with anybody willing to address the problem.”
This collaborative mindset, paired with a willingness to explore multiple solutions, defined his work with Xia, a PhD associate fellow at Verizon. “Our favourite Friday afternoon was picking the next thing to explore,” he recalls. “We’d write down 10 possible things and pull on the string that had legs.”
Fibre to Farming
As Wellbrock steps into retirement, he is teaming up with his brother.
The two own 400 acres in Kansas, where wheat farming, hunting, and fishing will define their days. “I won’t miss 100 emails a day or meetings all day long,” he admits. “But I’ll miss the interaction and building stuff.”
Farming offers a chance to work with one’s hands, doing welding and creating things from metal. “I love to build things,” he says. “It’s fun to go, ‘Why hasn’t somebody built this before?’
Farming projects can be completed in a day or over a weekend. “Networks take a long time to build,” he notes. “I’m looking forward to starting a project and finishing it quickly.”
He plans to cultivate half their land to fund their hobbies, using “old equipment” that requires hands-on maintenance—a nod to his engineering roots.
OFC farewell
Wellbrock retired just before the OFC show in March 2025. His attendance was less about work and more about transition, where he spent the conference introducing his successor to vendors and industry peers, ensuring a smooth handoff.
“I didn’t work as hard as I normally do at OFC,” he says. “It’s about meeting with vendors, doing a proper handoff, and saying goodbye to folks, especially international ones.” He also took part in this year’s OFC Rump Session.
Wellbrock admits to some sadness. Yet, he remains optimistic about his future, with plans to possibly return to OFC as a visitor. “Maybe I’ll come just to visit with people,” he muses.
Timeline
- 1984: MCI
- 1987: Started working on fibre
- 2000: Joined start-ups and, for a short period, was part of Marconi
- 2004: Joined Worldcom, which had bought MCI
- 2006: Joined Verizon
- 2025: Retired from Verizon
A tribute
Prof. Andrew Lord, Senior Manager, optical and quantum research, BT
I have had the privilege of knowing Glenn since the 1990s, when BT had a temporary alliance with MCI. We shared a vendor trip to Japan, where I first learnt of his appetite for breakfasting at McDonald’s!
Glenn has been a pivotal figure in our industry since then. A highlight would be the series of ambitious Requests For Information (RFIs) issued by Verizon, which would send vendor account managers scurrying to their R&D departments for cover.
Another highlight would be the annual world-breaking Post-Deadline Paper results at OFC: those thrilling sessions won’t be the same without a Wellbrock paper and neither will the OFC rump sessions, which have benefited from his often brutal pragmatism, always delivered with grace (which somehow made it even worse when defeating me in an argument!).
But it’s grace that defines the man who always has time for people and is always generous enough to share his views and experiences. Glenn will be sorely missed, but he deserves a fulfilling and happy retirement.
OFC: After the aliens, a decade to rewire the Earth
At the OFC 2025 Rump Session, held in San Francisco, three teams were set a weighty challenge. If a catastrophic event—a visit by aliens —caused the destruction of the global telecommunications network, how would each team’s ‘superheroes’ go about designing the replacement network? What technologies would they use? And what issues must be considered?
The Rump Session tackled a provocative thought experiment. If the Earth’s entire communication infrastructure vanished overnight, how would the teams go about rebuilding it?
Twelve experts – eleven from industry and one academic – were split into three teams.
The teams were given ten years to build their vision network. A decade was chosen as it is a pragmatic timescale and would allow the teams to consider using emerging technologies.
The Rump Session had four rounds, greater detail being added after each.
The first round outlined the teams’ high-level visions, followed by a round of architectures. Then a segment detailed technology, the round where the differences in the team’s proposals were most evident. The final round (Round 4), each team gave a closing statement before the audience chose the winning proposal.
The Rump Session mixed deep thinking with levity and was enjoyed by the participants and audience alike.
Round 1: Network vision
The session began with each team highlighting their network replacement vision.
Team A’s Rebecca Schaevitz opened by looking across a hundred-year window. Looking back fifty years to 1975, networking and computing were all electrical, she said, telephone lines, mainframe computing, radio and satellite.
Schaevitz said that by 2075, fifty years hence, connectivity will be the foundation of civilisation. The key difference between the networks a century apart is the marked transition from electrons to photons.
In the future vision, everything will be connected—clothes, homes, roads, even human brains—using sensors and added intelligence. As for work, offices will be replaced with real-time interactive holograms (suggesting humanity will still be working in 2075).
Schaevitz then outlined what must be done in the coming decade to enable Team A’s Network 2075 vision.
The network’s backbone must be optical, supporting multiple wavelengths and quantum communications. Team A will complement the fixed infrastructure with terabit-speed wireless and satellite mega-constellations. And AI will enable the network to be self-healing and adaptive, ensuring no downtime.
Vijay Vusirikala outlined Team B’s network assumptions. Any new network will need to support the explosive growth in computing and communications while being energy constrained. “We must reinvent communications from the ground up for maximum energy savings,” said Visurikala.
But scarcity—in this case energy—spurs creativity. The goal is to achieve 1000x more capacity for the same energy demand.
The network will have distributed computing based on mega data centres and edge client computing. Massive bandwidth will be made available to link humans and to link machines. Lastly, just enough standardisation will be used for streamlined networking.
Team C’s Katharine Schmidtke closed the network vision round. The goal is universal and cheap communications, with lots of fibre deployed to achieve this.
The emphasis will be on creating a unified fixed-mobile network to aid quick deployment and a unified fibre-radio spectrum for ample connectivity.
Team C stressed the importance of getting the network up and running by using a modular network node. It also argued for micro data centres to deliver computing close to end users.
Global funding will be needed for the infrastructure rebuild, and unlimited rights of way will be a must. Unconstrained equipment and labour will be used at all layers of the network.
Team C will also define the communication network using one infrastructure standard for interoperability. One audience member questioned the wisdom of a tiny committee alone specifying such a grand global project.
The network will also be sustainable by recycling the heat from data centres for crop production and supporting local communities.
Round 2: Architectures
Team A’s Tad Hofmeister opened Round 2 by saying what must change: the era of copper will end – no copper landlines will be installed. The network will also only use packet switching, no more circuit switch technology. And IPv4 will be retired (to great cheering from the audience).
Team A also proposed a staged deployment. First, a network of airborne balloons will communicate with smartphones and laptops, which will be connected to the ground using free-space optical links.
Stage 2 will add base stations complemented with satellite communications. Fibre will be deployed on a massive scale along roads, railways, and public infrastructure.
Hofmeister stressed the idea of the network being open and disaggregated with resiliency and security integral to the design.
There will be no single mega-telecom or hyperscaler; instead, multiple networks and providers will be encouraged. To ensure interoperability, the standards will be universal.
Security will be based on a user’s DNA key. What about twins? asked an audience member. Hofmeister had that covered: time-of-birth data will be included.
Professor Polina Bayvel detailed Team B’s architectural design. Here, packet and circuit switching is proposed to minimise energy/bit/ km. It will be a network with super high bandwidths, including spokes of capacity extending from massive data centres connecting population centres.
Bayvel argued the case for underwater data centres: 15 per cent of the population live near the coast, she said, and an upside would be that people could work from the beach.
Team C’s Glenn Wellbrock proposed unleashing as much bandwidth as possible by freeing up the radio spectrum and laying hollow-core fibre to offer as much capacity as possible.
Wellbrock views hollow-core fibre as a key optical communications technology that promises years of development, just like first erbium-doped fibre amplifiers (EDFAs) and then coherent optics technology have done.
Team C showed a hierarchical networking diagram mapped onto the geography of the US – similar to today’s network – with 10s of nodes for the wide area network, 100s of metropolitan networks, and 10,000s of access nodes.
Wellbrock proposes self-container edge nodes based on standardised hardware to deliver high-speed wireless (using the freed-up radio spectrum) and fibre access. There would also be shared communal hardware, though service providers could add their own infrastructure. Differentiation would be based on services.
AI would provide the brains for network operations, with expert staff providing the initial training.
Round 3: Technologies
Round 3, the enabling technologies for the new network, revealed the teams’ deeper thinking.
Team A’s Chris Doerr advocated streamlining and pragmatism to ensure rapid deployment. Silicon photonics will make a quick, massive-scale, and economic deployment of optics possible. Doerr also favours massive parallelism based on 200 gigabaud on-off keying (not PAM-4 signalling). With co-packaged optics added to chips, such parallel optical input-output and symbol rate will save significant power.
Standards for all aspects of networking will be designed first. Direct detection will be used inside the data centre; coherent digital signal processing will be used everywhere else. More radically, in the first five years, all generated intellectual property regarding series, converters, modems, and switch silicon will be made available to all competition. Chips will be assembled using chiplets.
For line systems, C-band only followed by the deployment of Vibranium-doped optical amplifiers (Grok 3 gives a convincing list of the hypothetical benefits of VDFAs). Parallelism will also play a role here, with spatial division multiplexing preferred to combining a fibre’s O, S, C and L bands.
Like Team C, Doerr also wants vast amounts of hollow-core fibre. It may cost more, but the benefits will be long-term, he said.
Peter Winzer (Team B) also argued for parallelism and a rethink in optics: the best ‘optical’ network may not be ‘optical’ given that photons get more expensive the higher the carrier frequency. So, inside the data centre, using the terahertz band and guided-wave wire promises 100x energy per bit benefits compared to using O-band or C-band optics.
Winzer also argues for 1000x more energy-efficient backbone connectivity by moving to 10-micron wavelengths and ultra-wideband operation to compensate for the 10x spectral efficiency loss that results. But for this to work, lots of fibre will be needed. Here, hollow-core fibre is a possible option.
Chris Cole brought the round to a close with radical ways to get the networking deployed. He mentioned Meta’s Bombyx, an installation machine that spins compact fibre cables along power lines.
Underground cabling would use nuclear fibre boring (including the patent number) which produces so much heat that it bores a tunnel while lining its walls with the molten material it produces. An egg-shaped portable nuclear reactor to power data centre containers was also proposed.
Cole defined a ‘universal’ transceiver with quadruple phase-shift keying (QPSK) modulation with no digital signal processing. “Spectral efficiency is not important as fibre will be plentiful,” says Cole.
Completing arguments
After each team had spent a total of some 14 minutes outlining their networks, they were given one more round for final statements.
Maxim Kuschnerov expanded on the team’s first-round slide, which outlined the ingredients needed to enable its Network 2075 vision. He also argued that every network element and connected device should be part of a global AI network. And AI will help co-design the new access network.
The new network will enable a massive wave of intelligent devices. Data will be kept at the edge, and the network will enable low-latency communications and inferencing at the edge.
Team B’s Dave Welch outlined some key statements: fusion energy will power the data centres with 80 per cent of the energy recycled from the heat. Transistors will pass the 10THz barrier, there will be 1000x scaling for the same energy, and an era of atto-joules/bit will begin. “And human-to-human interactions will still make the world go round,” says Welch.
Team C’s Jörg-Peter Elbers ended the evening presentations by outlining schemes to enable the new network: high-altitude platforms in a mega constellation (20km up) trailing fibre to the ground.
Such fibres and free-space links would also act as a sensing early-warning system in case the aliens returned.
Lastly, Elbers suggested we all get a towel (an important multi-purpose tool as outlined in Douglas Adams’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy). A towel can be used for hand-to-hand combat (when wet), ward off noxious fumes, and help avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter beast of Traal. Lastly, and in the spirit of the evening, if all else fails, a towel can be used for sending line-of-sight, low-bandwidth smoke signals.
Team C ended the presentations by throwing towels into the audience, like tennis stars after a match.
Common threads
All the teams agreed that fibre was necessary for the network backbone, with hollow-core fibre widely touted.
Two of the teams emphasised a staged rollout and all outlined ways to avoid the ills of existing legacy networks.
Differences included using satellites rather than fibre-fed high-altitude balloons, which are quicker and cheaper to deploy, and the idea of container edges rather than a more centralised service edge. All the teams were creative with their technological approaches.
What wasn’t discussed – it wasn’t in the remit – was the impact of a global disconnect on the world’s population. We would suddenly become broadband have-nots for several years, disconnected from smartphones and hours-per-day screen time.
The teams’ logical assumption was to get the network up and running with even greater bandwidth in the future. But would gaining online access after years offline change our habits? Would we be much more precious in using our upload and download bits? And what impact would a global comms disconnect have on society? Would we become more sociable? Would letter-writing become popular again? And would local communities be strengthened?
Maxim Kuschnerov came closest to this when, in his summary talk, he spoke about how the following iteration of network and communications should be designed to be a force for good for humanity and for its economic prospects.
Team winners
The audience chose Team B’s network proposal. However, the choice was controversial.
An online voting scheme, which would have allowed users to vote and change their vote as the session progressed, worked perfectly, but keeled over on the night.
The organisers’ fallback plan, measuring the decibel level of the audience’s cheers for each team, ended in controversy.
First, not all the Session attendees were present at the end. Second, a couple of the participants were seen self-cheering into a microphone. Evidence, if needed, as to the seriousness the ‘superheroes’ embraced architecting a new global network.
“It has been an evening of pure creative chaos: the more time I spend reflecting on the generated ideas, the more their value increases to me,” says Antonio Tartaglia of Ericsson, one of the organisers. “The voting chaos has been an act of God, because all three teams deserved to win.”
Tartaglia came up with this year’s theme for the Rump Session.
“Rump sessions are all about creative debate, and this year’s event took that to its full potential,” says Dirk van den Borne of Juniper Networks, another of the organisers. “Micro data centres, fibre-tethered balloons, Terahertz waveguides, and communication by pigeon; the sheer breath of ideas shows what an exciting and inventive industry we’re working in.”
The evening ended with a tribute to Team C’s Glenn Wellbrock. BT’s Professor Andrew Lord acknowledged Wellbrock’s career and contribution to optical communications.
Wellbrock officially retired days before the Rump Session.
BT’s first quantum key distribution network
The trial of a commercial quantum-secured metro network has started in London.
The BT network enables customers to send data securely between sites by first sending encryption keys over optical fibre using a technique known as quantum key distribution (QKD).
The attraction of QKD is that any attempt to eavesdrop and intercept the keys being sent is discernable at the receiver.
The network uses QKD equipment and key management software from Toshiba while the trial also involves EY, the professional services company.
EY is using BT’s network to connect two of its London sites and will showcase the merits of QKD to its customers.
London’s quantum network
BT has been trialling QKD for data security for several years. It had announced a QKD trial in Bristol in the U.K. that uses a point-to-point system linking two businesses.
BT and Toshiba announced last October that they were expanding their QKD work to create a metro network. This is the London network that is now being trialled with customers.
Building a quantum-secure network is a different proposition from creating point-to-point links.
“You can’t build a network with millions of separate point-to-point links,” says Professor Andrew Lord, BT’s head of optical network research. “At some point, you have to do some network efficiency otherwise you just can’t afford to build it.”
BT says quantum security may start with bespoke point-to-point links required by early customers but to scale a secure quantum network, a common pipe is needed to carry all of the traffic for customers using the service. BT’s commercial quantum network, which it claims is a world-first, does just that.
“We’ve got nodes in London, three of them, and we will have quantum services coming into them from different directions,” says Lord.
Not only do the physical resources need to be shared but there are management issues regarding the keys. “How does the key management share out those resources to where they’re needed; potentially even dynamically?” says Lord.
He describes the London metro network as QKD nodes with links between them.
One node connects Canary Wharf, London‘s financial district. Another node is in the centre of London for mainstream businesses while the third node is in Slough to serve the data centre community.
“We’re looking at everything really,” says Lord. “But we’d love to engage the data centre side, the financial side – those two are really interesting to us.”
Customers’ requirements will also differ; one might want a quantum-protected Ethernet service while another may only want the network to provide them with keys.
“We have a kind of heterogeneous network that we’re starting to build here, where each customer is likely to be slightly different,” says Lord.
QKD and post-quantum algorithms
QKD uses physics principles to secure data but cryptographic techniques also being developed are based on clever maths to make data secure, even against powerful future quantum computers.
Such quantum-resistant public-key cryptographic techniques are being evaluated and standardised by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
BT says it plans to also use such quantum-resistant techniques and are part of its security roadmap.
“We need to look at both the NIST algorithms and the key QKD ones,” says Lord. “Both need to be developed and to be understood in a commercial environment.“
Lord points out that the encryption products that will come out of the NIST work are not yet available. BT also has plenty of fibre, he says, which can be used not just for data transmission but also for security.
He also points out that the maths-based techniques will likely become available as freeware. “You could, if you have the skills, implement them yourself completely freely,” says Lord. “So the guys that make crypto kits using these maths techniques, how do they make money?”
Also, can a user be sure that those protocols are secure? “How do you know that there isn’t a backdoor into those algorithms?” says Lord. “There’s always this niggling doubt.”
BT says the post-quantum techniques are valuable and their use does not preclude using QKD.
Satellite QKD
Satellites can also be used for QKD.
Indeed, BT has an agreement with UK start-up Arqit which is developing satellite QKD technology whereby BT has exclusive rights to distribute and market quantum keys in the UK and to UK multinationals.
BT says satellite and fibre will both play a role, the question is how much of each will be used.
“They work well together but the fibre is not going to go across oceans, it’s going to be very difficult to do that,” says Lord. “And satellite does that very well.”
However, satellite QKD will struggle to provide dense coverage.
“If you think of a low earth orbit satellite coming overhead, it’s only gonna be able to lock onto to one ground station at a time, and then it’s gone somewhere else around the world,” says Lord. More satellites can be added but that is expensive.
He expects that a small number of satellite-based ground stations will be used to pick up keys at strategic points. Regional key distribution will then be used, based on fibre, with a reach of up to 100km.
“You can see a way in which satellite the fibre solutions come together,” says Lord, the exact balance being determined by economics.
Hollow-core fibre
BT says hollow-core fibre is also attractive for QKD since the hollowness of the optical fibre’s core avoids unwanted interaction between data transmissions and the QKD.
With hollow-core, light carrying regular data doesn’t interact with the quantum light operating at a different wavelength whereas it does for standard fibre that has a solid glass core.
“The glass itself is a mechanism that gets any photons talking to each other and that’s not good,” says Lord. “Particularly, it causes Raman scattering, a nonlinear process in glass, where light, if it’s got enough power, creates a lot of different wavelengths.”
In experiments using standard fibre carrying classical and quantum data, BT has had to turn down the power of the data signal to avoid the Raman effect and ensure the quantum path works.
Classical data generate noise photons that get into the quantum channel and that can’t be avoided. Moreover, filtering doesn’t work because the photons can’t be distinguished. It means the resulting noise stops the QKD system from working.
In contrast, with hollow-core fibre, there is no Raman effect and the classical data signal’s power can be ramped to normal transmission levels.
Another often-cited benefit of hollow-core fibre is its low latency performance. But for QKD that is not an issue: the keys are distributed first and the encryption may happen seconds or even minutes later.
But hollow-core fibre doesn’t just offer low latency, it offers tightly-controlled latency. With standard fibre the latency ‘wiggles around’ a lot due to the temperature of the fibre and pressure. But with a hollow core, such jitter is 20x less and this can be exploited when sending photons.
“As time goes on with the building of quantum networks, timing is going to become increasingly important because you want to know when your photons are due to arrive,” says Lord.
If a photon is expected, the detector can be opened just before its arrival. Detectors are sensitive and the longer they are open, the more likely they are to take in unwanted light.
“Once they’ve taken something in that’s rubbish, you have to reset them and start again,” he says. “And you have to tidy it all up before you can get ready for the next one. This is how these things work.“
The longer that detector can be kept closed, the better it performs when it is opened. It also means a higher key rate becomes possible.
“Ultimately, you’re going to need much better synchronisation and much better predictability in the fibre,” says Lord. “That’s another reason why I like hollow-core fibre for QKD.”
Quantum networks
“People focussed on just trying to build a QKD service, miss the point; that’s not going to be enough in itself,” says Lord. “This is a much longer journey towards building quantum networks.”
BT sees building quantum small-scale QKD networks as the first step towards something much bigger. And it is not just BT. There is the Innovate UK programme in the UK. There are also key European, US and China initiatives.
“All of these big nation-states and continents are heading towards a kind of Stage I, building a QKD link or a QKD network but that will take them to bigger things such as building a quantum network where you are now distributing quantum things.”
This will also include connecting quantum computers.
Lord says different types of quantum computers are emerging and no one yet knows which one is going to win. He believes all will be employed for different kinds of use cases.
“In the future, there will be a broad range of geographically scattered quantum computing resources, as well as classical compute resources,” says Lord. “That is a future internet.”
To connect such quantum computers, quantum information will need to be exchanged between them.
Lord says BT is working with quantum computing experts in the UK to determine what the capabilities of quantum computers are and what they are good at solving. It is classifying quantum computing capabilities into the different categories and matching them with problems BT has.
“In some cases, there’s a good match, in some cases, there isn’t,” says Lord. “So we try to extrapolate from that to say, well, what would our customers want to do with these and it’s a work in progress.”
Lord says it is still early days concerning quantum computing. But he expects quantum resources to sit alongside classical computing with quantum computers being used as required.
“Customers probably won’t use it for very long; maybe buying a few seconds on a quantum computer might be enough for them to run the algorithm that they need,” he says. In effect, quantum computing will eventually be another accelerator alongside classical computing.
”You already can buy time by the second on things like D-Wave Systems’ quantum computers, and you may think, well, how is that useful?” says Lord. “But you can do an awful lot in that time on a quantum computer.”
Lord already spends a third of his working week on quantum.
“It’s such a big growing subject, we need to invest time in it,” says Lord.
Making optical networking feel like cycling downhill
BT’s chief architect, Neil McRae, is a fervent believer in the internet, a technology built on the continual progress of optical networking. He discussed both topics during his invited talk at the recent OFC 2021 virtual conference and exhibition.
Neil McRae’s advocacy of the internet as an educational tool for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds stems from his childhood experiences.
“When I was a kid, I lived in a deprived area and the only thing that I could do was go to the library,” says McRae, chief architect and managing director for architecture and technology strategy at BT.
His first thought on discovering the internet was just how much there was to read.
“If I’m honest, everything I’ve learnt in technology has been pretty much self-taught,” says McRae.
This is why he so values the internet. It has given him a career where he has travelled widely and worked with talented and creative people.
“Anyone who is out there in the world can do the same thing,” he says. “I strongly believe that the internet brings opportunities to people who are willing to spend the time to learn.”
Optical networking
McRae surveyed the last 20 years of optical networking in his OFC talk. He chose the period since it was only at the end of the last century that the internet started to have a global impact.
“The investment in networking [during this period] has been orders of magnitude bigger than prior years,” says McRae. “There has also been a lot of deregulation across the world, more telecoms companies, more vendors and ultimately more people getting connected.”
In 2000, networks used the SONET/SDH protocol and fixed wavelengths. “We have brought in many new technologies – coherent, coloured optics, programable lasers and silicon photonics – and they have been responsible for pretty significant changes.”
McRae likens optical network to gears on a bike. “It powers the rest of what we do in the network and without those advances, we wouldn’t be the digitally connected society we are today,” says McRae. “If I think about the pandemic of the last year, can you imagine what the pandemic would have been like if it had happened in the year 2000?”
McRae says he spends a fifth of his time on optical networking. This is more than previously due to the relentless growth in network bandwidth.
“Ultimately, if you get optical wrong, it feels like you are in the wrong gear cycling uphill,” says McRae. “If you get it right, you are in the right gear, you are going as fast as you can go and it feels like a downhill ride.”
And it’s not just bandwidth but also from a cost, capability and customer experience perspective. “We recognise the value that it brings to all the other layers right up to the application,” he says.
Research
BT Labs has an optical networking programme that is run by Professor Andrew Lord. The programme’s remit is to help BT address existing and future issues.
“There is a longer-term research aspect to what Andrew and his team do, but there are some here-and-now issues that they support me on like the hollow-core fibre work and some of the 400-gigabit [coherent] platforms we have been reviewing recently,” he says.
He cites as examples the work the programme did for BT’s next-generation optical platform that was designed for growth and which indeed has grown massively in the last decade. “We have launched optical services as a product because of the platform,” says McRae.
The programme has also helped Openreach, BT Group’s copper and fibre plant subsidiary, with its fibre-to-the-premise (FTTP) deployments that use such technologies as GPON and XGS-PON.
Reliable, dynamic, secure networks
McRae admits he is always nervous about predicting the future. But he is confident 400 gigabits will be a significant optical development over the next decade.
This includes inside the data centre, driven by servers, and in the network including long haul.
“The challenge will be around getting the volume and interoperability as quickly as we possibly can,” says McRae.
The other big opportunity is the increased integration of IP and optical using a control plane aligned to both.
“The biggest networking technology out there is IP,” says McRae. “And that will not change in the coming decade.”
The Layer-3 capabilities include working around issues but it is bad at managing bandwidth. Optical is the opposite: great at managing bandwidth but less dynamic for working around problems. Merging the two promises significant benefits.
This idea, advocated as IP-over-DWDM, has long been spoken of but has not been deployed widely. The advent of 400-gigabit coherent implemented using client-side modules means that the line-side interface density can equal that of the host. And other developments such as software-defined networking and artificial intelligence also help.
Software-defined networking will make a big difference because it will enable the move to automation and that will enable new technologies such as artificial networking (AI) and machine-learning to be introduced.
McRae talks of a control plane capable of deciding which interface to send packets down and also determine what paths to create across the optical infrastructure.
“We have seen some of that but we have not seen enough,” says McRae. AI and machine-learning technologies will provide networks with almost autonomous control over which paths to use and enable for the various traffic types the network sees.
McRae stresses that it is getting harder to get the maximum out of the network: “If we maintain human intervention, the network will never see its full potential because of complexity, demands and scale.”
He predicts that once the human component is taken out of the network, some of the silos between the different layers will be removed. Indeed, he believes networks built by AI and aided by automation will look very different to today’s networks.
Another technology McRae highlights is hollow-core fibre which BT Labs has been researching.
“Increasingly, we are starting to reach some limits although many folks have said that before, but hollow-core fibre gives us some interesting and exciting opportunities around latency and the total use of a fibre,” says McRae.
There are still challenges to be overcome such as manufacturing the fibre at scale but he sees a path in many parts of the network where hollow-core fibre could be valuable to BT.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) and the importance of network security is another area starting to gain momentum.
“We have gone from a world where people were scared to send an email rather than a fax to one where the network is controlling mission-critical use cases,” says McRae. “The more secure and reliable we make those networks, the more it will help us in our everyday lives.”
McRae believes this is the decade where the underlying optical network capability coupled with QKD security will take effect.
Making a difference
McRae has run several events involving children with autism although during the pandemic this has not happened. He uses gaming as a way to demonstrate how electronics works – switching things on and off – and then he introduces the concept of computer programming.
“I find that kids with autism get it really quickly” he says. BT runs such events two or three times a year.
McRae also works with children who are learning to program but find it difficult. “Again, it is something self-taught for me,” he says although he quips that the challenge he has is that he teaches them bad programming habits.
“I’m keen to find the next generation of fantastic engineers; covid has shown us that we need them more than ever,” he says.