Ranovus developing DWDM links for the data centre
Ranovus has raised US $11 million in funding to develop Terabit capacity links for the data centre. The Ottawa-based start-up plans to use dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) technology to create huge data pipes that reduce significantly the power consumption, and cost, per bit.
The company says that it is not a silicon photonics start-up but rather a user of the technology to make its interface. Ranovus will use a foundry to make its optical chips.
Ranovus includes former staff of the coherent transmission and DSP specialist, CoreOptics, acquired by Cisco Systems in 2010. "Electronics, as we learnt from our previous endeavour, can impact in a big way the cost-performance of links," says Aramideh. "It doesn't have to be expensive equaliser technology we developed in the past, but there are ways of using similar technology in CMOS ICs to solve some of the network problems."
This suggests that DSP will be used to help cram the multiple channels in the fibre as well as achieve several hundred kilometers of reach. But the DSP will use simpler algorithms than those for long-distance coherent transmission.
Aramideh says its Terabit interface is inevitably a proprietary design. "[Industry] standards are important and you need to have dual sourcing, but people value having disruptive technologies," he says. "The challenge the industry has is that there hasn't been a lot of innovation going into technologies specifically for the data centre."
The start-up's technology is being validated with several lead customers. "It is early proof of technology and the platform in terms of configurations that the customers will be using," he says.
The $11m funding raised will be used to commercialise the technology and make the first products for lead customers. "We are very advanced in our plans with respect to delivery of our product," says Aramideh. Ranovus expects to provide first details of its product at OFC 2014.
Cisco Systems' 100 Gigabit spans metro to ultra long-haul
Cisco Systems has demonstrated 100 Gigabit transmission over a 3,000km span. The coherent-based system uses a single carrier in a 50GHz channel to transmit at 100 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps). According to Cisco, no Raman amplification or signal regeneration is needed to achieve the 3,000km reach.
Feature: Beyond 100G - Part 2
"The days of a single modulation scheme on a part are probably going to come to an end in the next two to three years"
Greg Nehib, Cisco
The 100Gbps design is also suited to metro networks. Cisco's design is compact to meet the more stringent price and power requirements of metro. The company says it can fit 42, 100Gbps transponders in its ONS 15454 Multi-service Transport Platform (MSTP), which is a 7-foot rack. "We think that is double the density of our nearest competitor today," claims Greg Nehib, product manager, marketing at Cisco Systems.
Also shown as part of the Cisco demonstration was the use of super-channels, multiple carriers that are combined to achieve 400 Gigabit or 1 Terabit signals.
Single-carrier 100 Gigabit
Several of the first-generation 100Gbps systems from equipment makers use two carriers (each carrying 50Gbps) in a 50GHz channel, and while such equipment requires lower-speed electronics, twice as many coherent transmitters and receivers are needed overall.
Alcatel-Lucent is one vendor that has a single-carrier 50GHz system and so has Huawei. Ciena via its Nortel acquisition offers a dual-carrier 100Gbps system, as does Infinera. With Ciena's announcement of its WaveLogic 3 chipset, it is now moving to a single-carrier solution. Now Cisco is entering the market with a single-carrier system.
"When you have a single carrier, you can get upwards of 96 channels of 100Gbps in the C-band," says Nehib. "The equation here is about price, performance, density and power."
What has been done
Cisco's 100Gbps design fits on a 1RU (rack unit) card and uses the first 100Gbps coherent receiver ASIC designed by the CoreOptics team acquired by Cisco in May 2010.
The demonstrated 3,000km reach was made using low-loss fibre. "This is to some degree a hero experiment," says Nehib. "We have achieved 3,000km with SMF ULL fibre from Corning; the LL is low loss." Normal fibre has a loss of 0.20-0.25dB/km while for ULL fibre it is in the 0.17dB/km range.
"You can do the maths and calculate the loss we are overcoming over 3,000km. We just want to signal that we have very good performance for ultra long-haul," says Nehib, who admits that results will vary in networks, depending on the fibre.
Nehib says Cisco's coherent receiver achieves a chromatic dispersion tolerance of 70,000 ps/nm and 100ps differential group delay. Differential group delay is a non-linear effect, says Nehib, that is overcome using the DSP-ASIC. The greater the group delay tolerance, the better the distance performance. These metrics, claims Cisco, are currently unmatched in the industry.
The company has not said what CMOS process it is using for its ASIC design. But this is not the main issue, says Nehib: "We are trying to develop a part that is small so that it fits in many different platforms, and we can now use a single part number to go from metro performance all the way to ultra long-haul."
Another factor that impacts span performance is the number of lit channels. Cisco, in the test performed by independent test lab EANTC, the European Advanced Network Test Center, used 70 wavelengths. "With 70 channels the performance would have been very close to what we would have achieved with [a full complement of] 80 channels," says Nehib.
Super-channels
A super-channel refers to a signal made up of several wavelengths. Infinera, with its DTN-X, uses a 500Gbps super-channel, comprising five 100Gbps wavelengths.
Using a super-channel, an operator can turn up multiple 100Gbps channels at once. If an operator wants to add a 100Gbps wavelength, a client interface is simply added to a spare 100Gbps wavelength making up the super-channel. In contrast turning up a 100Gbps wavelength in current systems usually requires several days of testing to ensure it can carry live traffic alongside existing links.
Another benefit of super-channels is scale by turning up multiple wavelengths simultaneously. As traffic grows so does the work load on operators' engineering teams. Super-channels aid efficiency.
"There is one other point that we hear quite often," says Nehib. "One other attraction of super-channels is overall spectral efficiency." The carriers that make up the signal can be packed more closely, expanding overall fibre capacity.
"Just like with 10 Gig, we think at some point in the future the 100 Gig network will be depleted, especially in the largest networks, and operators will be interested in 400 Gig and Terabit interfaces," says Nehib. "If that wavelength can further benefit from advanced modulation schemes and super-channels through flex[ible] spectrum deployment then you can get more total bandwidth on the fibre and better utilisation of your amplifiers."
Cisco's 100Gbps lab demonstration also showed 400 Gigabit and 1 Terabit super-channels, part of its research work with the Politechnico di Torino. "We are going to move on to other advanced modulation techniques and deliver 400 Gigabit and Terabit interfaces in future," says Nehib.
Existing 100Gbps systems use dual-polarisation, quadrature phase-shift keying (DP-QPSK). Using 16-QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) at the same baud rate doubles the data rate. Using 16-QAM also benefits spectral utilisation. If the more intelligent modulation format is used in a super-channel format, and the signal is fitted in the most appropriate channel spacing using flexible spectrum ROADMs, overall capacity is increased. However, the spectral efficiency of 16-QAM comes at the expense of overall reach.
"You are able to best match the rate to the reach to the spectrum," says Nehib. "The days of a single modulation scheme on a part are probably going to come to an end in the next two to three years."
Cisco has yet to discuss the addition of a coherent transmitter DSP which through spectral shaping can bunch wavelengths. Such an approach has just been detailed by Ciena with its WaveLogic 3 and Alcatel-Lucent with its 400 Gig photonic service engine.
For the Terabit super-channel demonstration, Cisco used 16-QAM and a flexible spectrum multiplexer. "The demo that we showed is not necessarily indicative of the part we will bring to market," says Nehib, pointing out that it is still early in the development cycle. "We are looking at the spectral efficiency of super-channels, different modulation schemes, flex-spectrum multiplexer, availability, quality, loss etc.," says Nehib. "We have not made firm technology choices yet."
Cisco's 100Gbps system is in trials with some 40 customers and can be ordered now. The product will be generally available in the near future, it says.
Further reading:
Light Reading: EANTC's independent test of Cisco's CloudVerse architecture. Part 4: Long-haul optical transport
MultiPhy eyes 40 and 100 Gigabit direct-detect and coherent schemes
MultiPhy's Avi Shabtai (left) and Ronen Weinberg
MultiPhy is developing transceiver designs to boost the transmission performance of metro and long-haul 40 and 100 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) links. The start-up is aiming its advanced digital signal processing (DSP) chips at direct detection and coherent-based modulation schemes.
“We are the only company, as far as we know, who is doing DSP-based semiconductors for the 40G and 100G direct-detect world,” says Avi Shabtai, CEO of Multiphy.
At 40Gbps the main direct-detection schemes are differential phase-shift keying (DPSK) and differential quadrature phase-shift keying (DQPSK), while at 100Gbps several direct-detect modulation schemes are being considered. “The fact that we are doing DSP at 40G and 100G enables us to achieve much better performance than regular hard-detection technology,” says Shabtai.
Established in 2007, the fabless semiconductor start-up raised US$7.2m in its latest funding round in May. MultiPhy is targeting its physical layer chips at module makers and system vendors. “While there is a clear ecosystem involving optical module companies and systems vendors, there is a lot of overlap,” says Shabtai. “You can find module companies that develop components; you can find system companies that skip the module companies, buying components to make their own line cards.”
MultiPhy’s CMOS chips include high-speed analogue-to-digital converters (ADC) and hardware to implement the maximum-likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE) algorithm. The company is operating the MLSE algorithm at “tens of gigasymbols-per-second”, says Shabtai. “We believe we are the only company implementing MLSE at these speeds.”
MultiPhy's office is alongside Finisar's Israeli headquartersMultiPhy will not disclose the exact sampling rate but says it is sampling at the symbol rate rather than at the Nyquist sampling theorem rate of double the symbol rate. Since commercial ADCs for 100Gbps have been announced that sample at 65Gsample/s, it suggests MultiPhy is sampling at up to half that rate.
MLSE is used to compensate for the non-linear impairments of fibre transmission, to improve overall transmission performance. “We implement an anti-aliasing filter at the input to the ADC and we use the MLSE engine to compensate for impairments due to the low-bandwidth sampling,” says Shabtai.
“There is a good chance that 100Gbps will leapfrog 40Gbps coherent deployments”
Avi Shabtai, MultiPhy
MultiPhy benefits from using one-sample-per-symbol in terms of simplifying the chip design and its power consumption but the MLSE algorithm must counter the resulting distortion. Shabtai claims the result is a significant reduction in power consumption compared to the tradition two-samples-per-symbol approach: “Tens of percent – I won’t say the exact number but it is not 10 percent.”
Other chip companies implementing MLSE designs for optical transmission include CoreOptics, which was acquired by Cisco in May, and Clariphy. (See Oclaro and Clariphy)
Does using MLSE make sense for 40Gbps DPSK and DQPSK?
“If you use DSP for DQPSK at 40Gbps you can significantly improve polarisation mode dispersion tolerance, the limiting factor today of DQPSK transceivers,” says Shabtai. MultiPhy expects the 40 Gigabit direct-detect market to shift towards DQPSK, accounting for the bulk of deployments in two years’ time.
Market applications
MultiPhy is delivering two solutions: for 40 and 100Gbps direct-detect, and 40 and 100Gbps coherent designs. The company has not said when it will deliver products but hinted that first it will address the direct-detect market and that chip samples will be available in 2011.
Not only will the samples enhance the reach of DQPSK-modulation based links but also allow the optical component specifications to be relaxed. For example, cheaper 10Gbps optical components can be used which, says MultiPhy, will reduce total design cost by “tens of percent”.
This is noteworthy, says Shabtai, as the direct-detect markets are increasingly cost-sensitive. “Coherent is being positioned as the high-end solution, and there will be pressure on the direct-detect market to show lower cost solutions,” he says.
MultiPhy is eyeing two 100Gbps spaces
MultiPhy’s view is that direct-detect modulation schemes will be deployed for quite some time due to their price and power advantage compared to coherent detection.
Another factor against 40Gbps coherent technology will be the price difference between 40Gbps and 100Gbps coherent schemes. “There is a good chance that 100Gbps will leapfrog 40Gbps coherent deployments,” he says. “The 40Gbps coherent modules will need to go a long way to get to the right price.” MultiPhy says it is hearing about the expense of coherent modules from system vendors and module makers, as well as industry analysts.
Metro and long-haul
The company says it has received several requests for 40Gbps and 100Gbps direct-detect schemes for the metro due to its sensitivity to cost and power consumption. “We are getting to the point in optical communications where one solution does not fit all – that the same solution for long-haul will also suit metro,” says Shabtai.
He believes 100Gbps coherent will become a mainstream solution but will take time for the technology to mature and its costs to come down. It will thus take time before 100Gbps coherent expands beyond long-haul and into the metro. He also expects a different 100Gbps coherent solution to be used in the metro. “The requirements are different – in reach, in power constraints” he says. “The metro will increasingly become a segment, not only for direct-detect but also for coherent.”
Coherent: Already a crowded market
There are at least a dozen companies actively developing silicon for coherent transmission, while half-a-dozen leading system vendors developing designs in-house. In addition, no-one really knows when the 100Gbps market will take off. So how does MultiPhy expect to fare given the fierce competition and uncertain time-to-revenues?
“It is very hard to predict the exact ramp up to high volumes,” says Shabtai. “At the end of the day, 100Gbps will come instead of 10Gbps and when people look back in five and six years’ time, they will say: ‘Gee, who would have expected so much capacity would have been needed?’.”
The big question mark is when will coherent technology ramp and this explains why MultiPhy is also targeting next-generation direct-detect schemes with its technology. “We cannot come to market doing the same thing as everyone else,” says Shabtai. “Having a solution that addresses power consumption based on one-sample-per-symbol gives us a significant edge.”
MultiPhy admits it has received greater market interest following Cisco’s acquisition of CoreOptics. “While Cisco said it would fulfill all previous commitments, still it worried some of CoreOptics’ customers,” says Shabtai. The acquisition also says something else to Shabtai: 100Gbps coherent is a strategic technology.
Did Cisco consider MultiPhy as a potential acquisition target? “First, I can’t comment, and I wasn’t at the company at the time,” says Shabtai.
As for design wins, Shabtai says MultiPhy is in “advanced discussion” with several leading module and system vendor companies concerning its 40Gbps and 100Gbps direct-detect and coherent technologies.
Further reading
See Opnext's multiplexer IC plays its part in 100Gbps trial
Cisco Systems' coherent power move
Cisco Systems announced its intent to acquire the optical transmission specialist CoreOptics back in May. CoreOptics has digital signal processing expertise used to enhance high-speed long-haul dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) optical transmission. Cisco’s acquisition values the German company at US $99m.
"Let me be clear, we don’t believe 100Gbps serial will dominate the market for a long time, or 40Gbps for that matter"
Mark Lutkowitz, Telecom Pragmatics
“It has become clear that Cisco, with a few exceptions, has cornered the coherent market for 40 Gig and 100 Gig,” says Mark Lutkowitz, principal at market research firm, Telecom Pragmatics, which has published a report on Cisco's move.
Prior to Cisco’s move, several system vendors were working with CoreOptics for coherent transmission technology at 40 and 100 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps). Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) was one and had invested in the company, another was Fujitsu Network Communications. Telecom Pragmatics believes other firms were also working with CoreOptics including Xtera and Ericsson (CoreOptics had worked with Marconi before it was acquired by Ericsson).
ACG Research in its May report Cisco/ CoreOptics Acquisition: What Does It Mean for the Packet Optical Transport Space? also claimed that the Cisco acquisition would set back NSN and Ericsson and listed other system vendors such as ADVA Optical Networking and Transmode that may have been considering using CoreOptics’ 100Gbps multi-source agreement (MSA) design.
“The mere fact that you have all these companies working with CoreOptics - and we don’t know all of them – says it all,” says Lutkowitz. “This was the company they were initially going to be depending on and Cisco made a power move that was brilliant.”
With Cisco bringing CoreOptics in-house, these system vendors will need to find a new coherent technology partner. “The next chance would be with a company like Opnext coming out with a sub-system,” says Lutkowitz. “There is no doubt about it – this was a major coup for Cisco.”
For Cisco, the deal is important for its router business more than its optical transmission business. “In terms of transceivers that go into routers and switches it was absolutely essential that Cisco comes up with coherent technology,” says Lutkowitz. Cisco views transport as a low-margin business unlike IP core routers. “This [acquisition] is about protecting Cisco’s bread and butter – the router business,” he says.
The acquisition also has consequences among the router vendors. Alcatel-Lucent has its own 100Gbps coherent technology which it could add to its router platforms. In contrast, the other main router player, Juniper Networks, must develop the technology internally or partner. Telecom Pragmatics claims Juniper has an internal coherent technology development programme.
40 and 100 Gig markets
Cisco kick-started the 40Gbps market when it added the high-speed interface on its IP core router and Lutkowitz expects Cisco to do the same at 100Gbps. “But let me be clear, we don’t believe 100Gbps serial will dominate the market for a long time, or 40Gbps for that matter.”
In Telecom Pragmatics’ view, multiple channels of 10Gbps will be the predominant approach. First, 10Gbps DWDM systems are widely deployed and their cost continues to come down. And while Alcatel-Lucent and Ciena already have 100Gbps systems, they remain expensive given the infancy of the technology.
But with business with large US operators to be won, systems vendors must have a 100Gbps optical transport offering. Verizon has an ultra-long haul request for proposal (RFP), AT&T has named Ciena as its first domain supplier for its optical and transport equipment but a second partner is still to be announced. And according to ACG Research, Google also has DWDM business.
What next?
Besides Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Infinera, Huawei, and now Cisco developing coherent technology, several optical module players are also developing 100Gbps line-side optics. These include Opnext, Oclaro and JDS Uniphase. There are also players such as Finisar that has yet to detail their plans. Lutkowitz believes that if Finisar is holding off developing 100Gbps coherent modules, it may prove a wise move given the continuing strength of the 10Gbps DWDM market.
Opnext acquired subsystem vendor StrataLight Communications in January 2009 and one benefit was gaining StrataLight’s systems expertise and its direct access to operators. Oclaro made its own subsystem move in July, acquiring Mintera. Oclaro has also partnered with Clariphy, which is developing coherent receiver ASICs.
But Telecom Pragmatics questions the long-term prospects of high-end line-side module/ subsystem vendors. “This [technology] is the guts of systems and where the money is made,” says Lutkowitz. “Ultimately all the system vendors will look to develop their own subsystems.”
Lutkowitz highlights other challenges facing module firms. Since they are foremost optical component makers it is challenging for them to make significant investment in subsystems. He also questions when the market 100Gbps will take off. “Some of our [market research] competitors talk about 2014 but they don’t know,” says Lutkowitz.
But is not the trend that over time, 40Gbps and 100Gbps modules will gain increasing share of the line side systems optics, as has happened at 10Gbps?
That is certainly LightCounting’s view that sees Cisco’s move as good news for component and transceiver vendors developing 40 and 100Gbps products. LightCounting argues that with Cisco’s commitment to the technology, other system vendors will have to follow suit, boosting demand for the higher-margin products.
“There will be all types of module vendors but it is possible that going higher in the food chain will not work out,” says Lutkowitz. “There will be more module and component vendors than we have now but all I question is: where are the examples of companies that have gone into subsystems that have done relatively well?”
Opnext is likely to be the next vendor with 100Gbps product, says Lutkowitz, and Oclaro could easily come out with its own offering. “All I’m saying is that there is a possibility that, in the final analysis, systems vendors take the technology and do it themselves.”