The Optical Internetworking Forum has begun specification work for virtual network services (VNS) that will enable customers of telcos to define their own networks. VNS will enable a user to define a multi-layer network (layer-1 and layer-2, for now) more flexibly than existing schemes such as virtual private networks.
Vishnu Shukla"Here, we are talking about service, and a simple way to describe it [VNS] is network slicing," says OIF president, Vishnu Shukla. "With transport SDN [software-defined networking], such value-added services become available."
The OIF work will identify what carriers and system vendors must do to implement VNS. Shukla says the OIF already has experience working across multiple networking layers, and is undertaking transport SDN work. "VNS is a really valuable extension of the transport SDN work," says Shukla.
The OIF expects to complete its VNS Implementation Agreement work by year-end 2015.
Meanwhile, the OIF's Carrier Working Group has published its recommendations document, entitled OIF Carrier WG Requirements for Intermediate Reach 100G DWDM for Metro Type Applications, that provides input for the OIF's Physical Link Layer (PLL) Working Group.
The PLL Working Group is defining the requirements needed for a compact, low-cost and low-power 100 Gig interface for metro and regional networks. This is similar to the OIF work that successfully defined the first 100 Gig coherent modules in a 5x7-inch MSA.
The Carrier Working Group report highlights key metro issues facing operators. One is the rapid growth of metro traffic which, according to Cisco Systems, will surpass long-haul traffic in 2014. Another is the change metro networks are undergoing. The metro is moving from a traditional ring to a mesh architecture with the increasing use of reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers (ROADMs). As a result, optical wavelengths have further to travel, must contend with passing through more ROADMs stages and more fibre-induced signal impairments.
Shukla stresses there are differences among operators as to what is considered a metro network. For example, metro networks in North America span 400-600km typically and can be as much as 1,000km. In Europe such spans are considered regional or even long-haul networks. Metro networks also vary greatly in their characteristics. "Because of these variations, the requirements on optical modules varies so much, from unit to unit and area to area," says Shukla.
Given these challenges, operators want a module with sufficient optical performance to contend with the ROADM stages, and variable distances and network conditions encountered. "Sometimes we feel that the requirements [between metro and long-haul] won't be that much [different]," says Shukla. Indeed, the Carrier Working Group report discusses how the boundaries between metro and long-haul networks are blurring.
Yet operators also want such robust optical module performance at a greatly reduced price. One of the report's listed requirements is the need for the 100 Gig intermediate-reach interfaces to cost 'significantly' less than the cheapest long-haul 100 Gig.
To this aim, the report recommends that the 100 Gig pluggable optical modules such as the CFP or CFP2 be used. Standardising on industry-accepted pluggable MSAs will drive down cost as happened with the introduction of 100 Gig long haul 5x7-inch MSA modules.
Metro and regional coherent interfaces will also allow the specifications to be relaxed in terms of the DSP-ASIC requirements and the modulation schemes used. "When we come to the metro area, chances are that some of the technologies can be done more simply, and the cost will go down," says Shukla. Using pluggables will also increase 100 Gig line card densities, further reducing cost, while the report also favours the DSP-ASIC being integrated into the pluggable module, where possible.
Contributors to the Carrier Working Group report include representatives from China Telecom, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telus and Verizon, as well as module maker Acacia.