Vendors and service providers are implementing the first examples of flexible, elastic-bandwidth networks. Infinera and Microsoft detailed one such network at the Layer123 Terabit Optical and Data Networking conference held earlier this year.
Optical networking expert Ioannis Tomkos of the Athens Information Technology Center explains what is flexible, elastic bandwidth.
Part 1: Flexible elastic bandwidth
"We cannot design anymore optical networks assuming that the available fibre capacity is abundant"
Prof. Tomkos
Several developments are driving the evolution of optical networking. One is the incessant demand for bandwidth to cope with the 30+% annual growth in IP traffic. Another is the changing nature of the traffic due to new services such as video, mobile broadband and cloud computing.
"The characteristics of traffic are changing: A higher peak-to-average ratio during the day, more symmetric traffic, and the need to support higher quality-of-service traffic than in the past," says Professor Ioannis Tomkos of the Athens Information Technology Center.
"The growth of internet traffic will require core network interfaces to migrate from the current 10, 40 and 100Gbps to 1 Terabit by 2018-2020"
Operators want a more flexible infrastructure that can adapt to meet these changes, hence their interest in flexible elastic-bandwidth networks. The operators also want to grow bandwidth as required while making best use of the fibre's spectrum. They also require more advanced control plane technology to restore the network elegantly and promptly following a fault, and to simplify the provisioning of bandwidth.
The growth of internet traffic will require core network interfaces to migrate from the current 10, 40 and 100Gbps to 1 Terabit by 2018-2020, says Tomkos. Such bit-rates must be supported with very high spectral efficiencies, which according to latest demonstrations are only a factor of 2 away of the Shannon's limit. Simply put, optical fibre is rapidly approaching its maximum limit.
"We cannot design anymore optical networks assuming that the available fibre capacity is abundant," says Tomkos. "As is the case in wireless networks where the available wireless spectrum/ bandwidth is a scarce resource, the future optical communication systems and networks should become flexible in order to accommodate more efficiently the envisioned shortage of available bandwidth.”
The attraction of multi-carrier schemes and advanced modulation formats is the prospect of operators modifying capacity in a flexible and elastic way based on varying traffic demands, while maintaining cost-effective transport.
Elastic elements
Optical systems providers now realise they can no longer keep increasing a light path's data rate while expecting the signal to still fit in the standard International Telecommunication Union (ITU) - defined 50GHz band.
It may still be possible to fit a 200 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) light path in a 50GHz channel but not a 400Gbps or 1 Terabit signal. At 400Gbps, 80GHz is needed and at 1 Terabit it rises to 170GHz, says Tomkos. This requires networks to move away from the standard ITU grid to a flexible-based one, especially if operators want to achieve the highest possible spectral efficiency.
Vendors can increase the data rate of a carrier signal by using more advanced modulation schemes than dual polarisation, quadrature phase-shift keying (DP-QPSK), the defacto 100Gbps standard. Such schemes include amplitude modulation at 16-QAM, 64-QAM and 256-QAM but the greater the amplitude levels used and hence the data rates, the shorter the resulting reach.
Another technique vendors are using to achieve 400Gbps and 1Tbps data rates is to move from a single carrier to multiple carriers or 'super-channels'. Such an approach boosts the data rate by encoding data on more than one carrier and avoids the loss in reach associated with higher order QAM. But this comes at a cost: using multiple carriers consumes more, precious spectrum.
As a result, vendors are looking at schemes to pack the carriers closely together. One is spectral shaping. Tomkos also details the growing interest in such schemes as optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and Nyquist WDM. For Nyquist WDM, the subcarriers are spectrally shaped so that they occupy a bandwidth close or equal to the Nyquist limit to avoid inter symbol interference and crosstalk during transmission.
Both approaches have their pros and cons, says Tomkos, but they promise optimum spectral efficiency of 2N bits-per-second-per-Hertz (2N bits/s/Hz), where N is the number of constellation points.
The attraction of these techniques - multi-carrier schemes and advanced modulation formats - is the prospect of operators modifying capacity in a flexible and elastic way based on varying traffic demands, while maintaining cost-effective transport.
"With flexible networks, we are not just talking about the introduction of super-channels, and with it the flexible grid," says Tomkos. "We are also talking about the possibility to change either dynamically."
According to Tomkos, vendors such as Infinera with its 5x100Gbps super-channel photonic integrated circuit (PIC) are making an important first step towards flexible, elastic-bandwidth networks. But for true elastic networks, a flexible grid is needed as is the ability to change the number of carriers on-the-fly.
"Once we have those introduced, in order to get to 1 Terabit, then you can think about playing with such parameters as modulation levels and the number of carriers, to make the bandwidth really elastic, according to the connections' requirements," he says.
Meanwhile, there are still technology advances needed before an elastic-bandwidth network is achieved, such as software-defined transponders and a new advanced control plane.
Tomkos says that operators are now using control plane technology that co-ordinates between layer three and the optical layer to reduce network restoration time from minutes to seconds. Microsoft and Infinera cite that they have gone from tens of minutes down to a few seconds using the more advanced optical infrastructure. "They [Microsoft] are very happy with it," says Tomkos.
But to provision new capacity at the optical layer, operators are talking about requirements in the tens of minutes; something they do not expect will change in the coming years. "Cloud services could speed up this timeframe," says Tomkos.
"There is usually a big lag between what operators and vendors do and what academics do," says Tomkos. "But for the topic of flexible, elastic networking, the lag between academics and the vendors has become very small."
Further reading: