Briefing: Green ICT
Part 1: Standards and best practices
Keith Dickerson is chair of the International Telecommunication Union's (ITU) working party on information and communications technology (ICT) and climate change.
In a Q&A with Gazettabyte, he discusses how ICT can help reduce emissions in other industries, where the power hot spots are in the network and what the ITU is doing.
"If you benchmark base stations across different countries and different operators, there is a 5:1 difference in their energy consumption"
Keith Dickerson
Q. Why is the ITU addressing power consumption reduction and will its involvement lead to standards?
KD: We are producing standards and best practices. The reason we are involved is simple: ICT – all IT and telecoms equipment - is generating 2% of [carbon] emissions worldwide. But traffic is doubling every two years and the energy consumption of data centres is doubling every five years. If we don’t watch out we will be part of the problem. We want to reduce emissions in the ICT sector and in other sectors. We can reduce emissions in other sectors by 5x or 6x what we emit in our own sector.
Just to understand that figure, you believe ICT can cut emissions in other industries by a factor of six?
KD: We could reduce emissions overall by 15% worldwide. Reducing things like travel and storage of goods and by increasing recycling. All these measures in conjunction, enabled by ICT, could reduce overall emissions by 15%. These sectors include travel, the forestry sector and waste management. The energy sector is huge and we can reduce emissions here by up to 30% using smarter grids.
What are the trends regarding ICT?
KD: ICT accounts for 2% at the moment, maybe 2.5% if you include TV, but it is growing very fast. By 2020 it could be 6% of worldwide emissions if we don’t do something. And you can see why: Broadband access rates are doubling every two years, and although the power-per-bit is coming down, overall power [consumed] is rising.
Where are the hot spots in the network?
The areas where energy consumption is going up most greatly are at the ends of the network. They are in the home equipment and in data centres. Within the network it is still going up, but it is under control and there are clear ways of reducing it.
For example all operators are moving to a next-generation network (NGN) – BT is doing this with its 21CN - and this alone leads to a power reduction. It leads to a significant reduction in switching centres, by a factor of ten. And you can collapse different networks into a single IP network, reducing the energy consumption [associated with running multiple networks]. The equipment in the NGN doesn’t need as much cooling or air conditioning. The use of more advanced access technology such as VDSL2 and PON will by itself lead to a reduction in power-per-bit.
The EU has a broadband code of conduct which sets targets in reducing energy consumption in the access network and that leads to technologies such as standby modes. My home hub, if I don’t use it for awhile, switches to a low-power mode.
The ITU is looking at how to apply these low–power modes to VDSL2. There has also been a very recent proposal to reduce the power levels in PONs. There has been a contribution from the Chinese for a deep-sleep mode for XG-PON. The ITU-T Study Group 13 on future networks is also looking at such techniques, shutting down part of the core network when traffic levels are low such as at night.
What about mobile networks?
If you benchmark them across different countries and different operators there is a 5:1 difference in the energy consumption of base stations. They are running the same standard but their energy efficiency is somewhat different; they have been made at different times and by different vendors.
In a base station, some half of the power is lost in the [signal] coupling to the antenna. If you can make amplifiers more efficient and reduce the amount of cooling and air-condition required by the base station, you can reduce energy consumption by 70 or 80%. If all operators and all counties used best practices here, energy consumption in the mobile network could be reduced by 50% to 70%.
If you could get overall power consumption of a base station down to 100W, you could power it from renewable energy. That would make a huge difference; it could work without having to worry about the reliability of the electricity grid which in India and Africa is a tricky problem. And at the moment the price of diesel fuel [to power standby generators] is going through the roof.
I visited Huawei recently and they have examples of 100W base stations powered by renewable energy, making them independent of the electricity network. At the moment a base station consume more like 1000W and overall they consume over half the overall power used by a mobile operator. At 100W, that wouldn’t be the case.
Other power saving activities in mobile include sharing networks among operators such as Orange and T-Mobile in the UK. And BT has signed a contract with four out of the five UK mobile operators to provide their backhaul and core networks in the future.
What is the ITU doing with regard energy saving schemes?
The ITU set up the working party on ICT and climate change less than two years ago. We have work in three different areas.
One is increasing energy efficiencies in ICT which we are doing through the widespread introduction of best practices. We are relying on the EC to set targets. The ITU, because it has 193 countries involved, finds it very difficult to agree targets. So we issue best practices which show how targets can be met. This covers data centres, broadband and core networks.
Another of our areas is agreeing a common methodology for how to measure the impact of ICT on carbon emissions. We have been working on this for 18 months and the first recommendations should be consented this summer. Overall this work will be completed in the next two years. This will enable you to measure the emissions of ICT by country, or sector, or an individual product or service, or within a company. If companies don’t meet their targets in future they will be fined so it is very important companies are measured in the same way.
A third area of our activities are things like recycling. We have produced a standard for a universal charger for mobile phones. You won’t have to buy a new charger each time you buy a new phone. At the moment thousands of tonnes of chargers go to landfill [waste sites] every year. The standard introduced by the ITU last year only covers 25% of handsets. The revised standard will raise that to 80%.
At the last meeting the Chinese also proposed a universal battery – or a range of batteries. This would means you don’t have to throw away your old battery each time you buy a new mobile. It is all about reducing the amount of equipment that goes into landfill.
We are also doing some other activities. Most telecom equipment use a 50V power supply. We are taking that up to 400V. So a standard power supply for a data centre or a switch would be at 400V. This would mean you would lose a lot less power in the wiring as you would be operating at a lower current - power losses vary according to the square of the current.
These ITU activities coupled with operators moving to new architectures and adopting new technologies will all help yet traffic is doubling every two years. What will be the overall effect?
It all depends on the targets that are set. The EU is putting in more and more severe targets. If companies have to pay a fine if they don’t meet them, they will introduce new technologies more quickly. Companies won’t pay the extra investment unless they have to, I’m afraid, especially during this difficult economic period.
Every year the EC revises the code of conduct on broadband and sets stiffer targets. They are driving the introduction of new technology into the industry, and everyone wants to sign up to show that they are using best practices.
What the ITU is doing is providing the best practices and the standards to help them do that. The rate at which they act will depend on how fast those targets are reduced.
Keith Dickerson is a director at Climate Associates.
Part 2 Operators' power efficiency strategies