What is being announced?
BroadLight has announced its Lilac family of customer premise equipment (CPE) chips that support the Gigabit Passive Optical Network (GPON) standard.
The company claims its GPON devices with be the first to be implemented using a 40nm CMOS process. The advanced CMOS process, coupled with architectural enhancements, will double the devices' processing performance while improving by five-fold the packet-processing capability. The devices also come with a hardware abstraction layer that will help system vendors tailor their equipment.
"Traffic models and service models are not stable, and there are a lot of differences from carrier to carrier"
Didi Ivancovsky, BroadLight
Lilac will also act as a testbed for technologies needed for XG-PON, the emerging next generation GPON standard. XG-PON will support a 10 Gigabit-per-second (Gbps) downstream and 2.5Gbps upstream rate, and is set for approval by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) in September.
Why is this important?
GPON networks are finally being rolled out by carriers after a slow start. Yet the GPON chip market is already mature; Lilac is BroadLight’s third-generation CPE family.
Major chip vendors such as Broadcom and Marvell are also now competing with the established GPON chip suppliers such as BroadLight and PMC-Sierra. “The [big] gorillas are entering [the market],” says Didi Ivancovsky, vice president of marketing at BroadLight.
BroadLight claims it has 60% share of the GPON CPE chip market. For the central office, where the optical line terminal (OLT) GPON integrated circuits (ICs) reside, the market is split between 40% merchant ICs and 60% FPGA-based designs. BroadLight claims it has over 90% of the OLT merchant IC market.
The Lilac family is Broadlight’s response to increasing competition and its attempt to retain market share as deployments grow.
GPON market
US operator Verizon with its FiOS service remains the largest single market in terms of day-to-day GPON deployments. But now significant deployments are taking place in Asia.
“Verizon might still be the largest individual deployer, but China Telecom and China Mobile are catching up fast,” says Jeff Heynen, directing analyst, broadband and video at Infonetics Research. “In fact, the aggregate GPON market in China is now larger than what Verizon has been deploying, given that Verizon’s OLT numbers have really slowed while its optical network terminal (ONT) shipments remain high at some 200,000 per quarter.”
“Verizon might still be the largest individual deployer, but China Telecom and China Mobile are catching up fast”
Jeff Heynen, Infonetics Research
Chinese operators are deploying both GPON and Ethernet PON (EPON) technologies. According to BroadLight, Chinese carriers are moving from deploying multi-dwelling unit (MDU) systems to single family unit (SFU) ONTs.
An MDU deployment involves bringing PON to the basement of a building and using copper to distribute the service to individual apartments. However such deployments have proved less popular that expected such that operators are favouring an ONT-per-apartment.
“Through this transition, China Telecom and China Unicom are also making the transition to GPON,” says Ivancovsky. “End–to-end prices of EPON and GPON are practically the same,” GPON has a download speed of 2.5Gbps and an upload speed of 1.25Gbps (Gbps) while for EPON it is 1.25Gbps symmetrical.
China Telecom and China Unicom are deploying GPON is several provinces whereas in major population centres the PON technology is being left unspecified; vendors can propose either the use of EPON or GPON. “This is a big change, really a big change,” says Ivancovsky.
In India, BSNL and a handful of private developers have been the primary GPON deployers, though the Indian market is still in its infancy, says Heynen. Ericsson has also announced a GPON deployment with infrastructure provider Radius Infratel that will involve 600,000 homes and businesses.
“I expect there to be a follow-on tender for BSNL later this year or early next year that will be twice the size of the first tender of 700,000 total GPON lines,” says Heynen. He also expects MTNL to begin deploying GPON early next year.
In other markets, Taiwan’s Chunghwa Telecom has issued its first tender for GPON. Telekom Malaysia is deploying GPON as is Hong Kong Broadband Network (HKBN), while in Australia the National Broadband Network Company will roll-out a 100Mbps fibre-to-the-home network to 90% of Australian premises over eight years working with Alcatel-Lucent.
“Let’s not forget about Europe, which has been basically dormant from a GPON perspective,” adds Heynen. “We now have commitments from France Telecom, Deutsche Telekom, and British Telecom to roll out more FTTH using GPON, which should help increase the overall market, which really was being driven by Telefonica, Portugal Telecom, and Eitsalat.”
Infonetics expects 2010 to be the first year that GPON revenue will exceed EPON revenue: US $1.4 billion worldwide compared to $1.02 billion. By 2014, the market research firm expects GPON revenue to reach $2.5 billion with EPON revenue - 1.25Gbps and 10Gbps EPON - to be US $1.5 billion. “At this point, China, Japan, and South Korea will be the only major EPON markets with many MSOs also using EPON for FTTH and business services,” says Heynen.
What’s been done?
BroadLight offers a range of devices in the Lilac family. It has enhanced the control processing performance of the CPE devices using 40nm CMOS, and has also added more network processor unit (NPU) cores to enhance the ICs’ data plane processing performance.
“It’s been the same story for some time now,” says Heynen. “System-on-chip vendors differentiate themselves on four key aspects: footprint, power consumption, speed and, most importantly, cost”
A key driver for upping the Lilac family’s control processor’s performance is to support the Java programming language and the OSGi Framework, says Ivancovsky. The OSGi Framework used with embedded systems has yet to be deployed on gateways but is becoming mandatory. This will enable the CPE gateway to run downloaded applications much as applications stores now complement mobile handsets.
BroadLight has also doubled to four the on-chip RunnerGrid NPU cores. “Traffic models and service models are not stable, and there are a lot of differences from carrier to carrier” says Ivancovsky. “This [on-chip] flexibility helps us to have a single device that can support many different requirements.”
As an example, Broadlights cites South Korean operator, SK Broadband, which is deploying an ONT supporting two gigabit Ethernet (GbE) ports – one for laptops and the other for the home’s set-top box. Thus a single GPON 2.5Gbps stream is delivered down the fibre and shared between the PON’s 32 or 64 ONTs, with each ONT having two 1GbE links.“The carrier wants to limit the IPTV downstream rate according to the service level agreement,” says Ivancovsky. Having the network processor as part of the CPE, the carrier can avoid deploying more more expensive NPUs at the central office.
The overall result is a Lilac family rated at 2,000 Dhrystone MIPS (DMIPS) and a packet processing capability of 15 million packets per second (Mpps) compared to BroadLight’s current-generation CPE family of 650-900 DMIPs and 3Mpps.
“Broadlight understands that you have to have a range of chips that provide flexibility across a wide range of CPE and infrastructure types,” says Heynen. The CPE demands of a Verizon differ markedly from those of China Telecom, for example, primarily because average-revenue-per-user expectations are so different. Verizon wants to provide the most advanced integrated CPE, with the ability to do TR-069 remote provisioning and both broadcast and on-demand TV, while China Telecom is concerned with achieving sustained downstream bandwidth, with IPTV being a secondary concern, he says.
Heynen also highlights the devices’ software stack with its open application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow third-party developers to develop applications on top of features already provided in BroadLight’s software stack.
“Residential gateway software stacks used to be dominated by Jungo (NDS). But now chipset companies are developing their own, which helps to reduce licensing costs on a per CPE basis,” says Heynen. “If a silicon vendor can provide a hardware abstraction layer like this, it makes it very attractive to system vendors who need an easy way to customise feature sets for a wide range of customers.”
Is the Lilac GPON family fast enough to support XG-PON?
“We are deep in the design of XG-PON end-to-end: one team is working on the OLT and one on the ONT,” says Ivancovsky. “We expect an FPGA prototype very early in 2011.”
The first XG-PON product will be an OLT ASIC rated at 40Gbps: supporting four XG-PON or 16 GPON ports. One XG-PON challenge is developing a 10Gbps SERDES (serialiser/ deserialiser), says Ivancovsky: “The SERDES in Lilac is a 10Gbps one, a preparation for XG-PON devices.”
Meanwhile, the first XG-PON CPE design will be implemented using an FPGA but the control processor used will be the one used for Lilac. As for data plane processing, NPUs will be added to the OLT design while more NPUs cores will be needed within the CPE device. “The number of cores in the Lilac will not be enough; we are talking about 40Gbps,” says Ivancovsky.
Lilac device members
Ivancovsky highlights three particular devices in the Lilac family that will start appearing from the fourth quarter of this year:
- The BL23530 aimed at GPON single family units with VoIP support. To reduce its cost, a low-cost packaging will be used.
- The BL23570 which is aimed at the integrated GPON gateway market.
- The BL23510, a compact 10x10mm IC to be launched after the first two. The chip’s small size will enable it to fit within an SFP form-factor transceiver. The resulting SFP transceiver can be added to connect a DSLAM platform, or upgrade an enterprise platform, to GPON.
“This new system-on-chip is a technology improvement, especially with respect to the residential gateway software layer, which is a requirement among most operators,” concludes Heynen. “But it should be noted this is an addition to, not a replacement for, existing BroadLight chips that solve different infrastructure requirements.”